A point missing about adaline's revenge. It was the resistance that saved her from the verrat. When she does find out that Victor does not have the baby, and tells her the baby was taken from him by the resistance. After doing something to victor, her next move would be to have Renard contact the resistance. She only took Nicks powers as a way to get the baby back. Depending on how Renard and Nick handle the question about the resistance having the baby Adaline could see them as savior instead of enemy. What we don't know is the real reason they had Kelly take the baby. Plus why does the baby have this connection with kelly. The other thing I wonder, why would victor say he has the baby. Why not say the resistance took the baby from him. That would send Adaline on a mission to track down the resistance. That seems a much better move then using her to attack Nick. Plus why take his grimm why not just kill him. Looking like Juliette she could have just walked into the house picked up Nicks own gun and shot him. Or is this one of those story lines where the villian ties up the hero for dramatic effect, stupid but dramatic. What I wonder from the writer point, where do they make her allegiance lie. The Royals they are the ones that started the mission of taking her baby, now they lied about it. I see this the making of a really nasty spell. Nick, Renard? Only if they can get her to listen to reason, that unless the pulled the switch all of them would be dead by now. But then Adaline has never shown to be one the listen to reason. She is not a leader or a loner, so what do the writer do. Drag out the alliance with the Royal's until she figures out she has been betrayed. Who in their right mind pisses of a hexanbeast? someone that can seek revenge without even laying a hand on you. (did she take her mothers book of spells and skeleton key with her)
Embrace your inner Biest..... We all have one