(01-01-2018, 06:19 AM)New Guy Wrote:(12-31-2017, 06:21 PM)irukandji Wrote: Hi New Guy-Hello Iruk,
Nick is an affront to our men in blue who risk their lives every day serving the public, which includes alleged criminals. As you're well aware, I consider him an affront to my father, who was a dedicated sergeant and detective on the force for decades. The series took potshots at our men in blue. What else can I say?
What you must say and do is simple. As I said in #8:
Quote:Surely you can produce proof that Nick acted dishonestly in return for money or personal gain.Your attempt in to reply in #13 was irrelevant. Nick's "desire to become and stay a grimm" was not personal gain. His Grimm was stolen and as a victim he had a right to recovery. Recovering something stolen is not dishonest. In fact, a good cop should act to recover something stolen and return it to the owner.
In case you forgot, here is the definition:
Quote:Corrupt:If you can prove (provide factual evidence) Nick meets the definition then do it. Try harder. Make it a New Year's Resolution.
having or showing a willingness to act dishonestly in return for money or personal gain.
N G
Hello New Guy-
A couple of days ago you spent some time explaining about your faith, that it comes from both parental guidance and personal seeking. You are active in your church, do volunteer work and, well you know what you did.
Does your faith include baiting and badgering? This is what I see here. I tell you quite calmly that Nick is an affront to my father, which is clearly a personal thing to me. I posed a question to Robyn based on her response. She responded with a well thought out post.
You're certainly welcome and encouraged to respond, but your response was quite different. Robyn's post was respectful. You not only talked down to me, but stated that I should make it a New Years Resolution to show factual evidence that Nick meets the definition of corrupt. If you are as firm in your faith as you portrayed in your post the other day, you would not have badgered or baited, but instead simply continued with the discussion.
I leave you with this one final thought as this may help you to understand where I'm coming from. Also, I have said this before so it should be no surprise.
You have taken oaths as part of your faith. I assume from your post the other day that you are firm in keeping those oaths. Law Enforcement also take an oath to serve and protect their community. That's not verbatim, but you get the general idea. Also, part of the oath is on the OPD cars in Grimm. I believe it says "to protect and serve"
Where in the oath does it state that Nick can serve and protect only those who he deems deserving of his grimmness?
BTW, Nick was about to torture a suspect in one of the episodes. I do not know the name but it was the episode where the wesen was imitating one of the very feared grimms. Even Hank was appalled.
The best way to frustrate a cyberbully is to ignore him.