(12-31-2017, 06:21 PM)irukandji Wrote: Hi New Guy-Hello Iruk,
Nick is an affront to our men in blue who risk their lives every day serving the public, which includes alleged criminals. As you're well aware, I consider him an affront to my father, who was a dedicated sergeant and detective on the force for decades. The series took potshots at our men in blue. What else can I say?
What you must say and do is simple. As I said in #8:
Quote:Surely you can produce proof that Nick acted dishonestly in return for money or personal gain.Your attempt in to reply in #13 was irrelevant. Nick's "desire to become and stay a grimm" was not personal gain. His Grimm was stolen and as a victim he had a right to recovery. Recovering something stolen is not dishonest. In fact, a good cop should act to recover something stolen and return it to the owner.
In case you forgot, here is the definition:
Quote:Corrupt:If you can prove (provide factual evidence) Nick meets the definition then do it. Try harder. Make it a New Year's Resolution.
having or showing a willingness to act dishonestly in return for money or personal gain.
N G