(12-31-2017, 04:53 PM)irukandji Wrote: Renard started off the same way he ended. Nick did not. So, for me, it's Nick all the way.Hi Iruk,
The Google definition:
Quote:Corrupt:fits Renard like a glove. Henry listed a preponderance of evidence to prove Renard's corruption.
having or showing a willingness to act dishonestly in return for money or personal gain.
When did Nick act dishonestly in return for money or personal gain? Perhaps when he saved Monroe from death at the Löwen Games that Renard was helping operate and was on the take?
Surely you can produce proof that Nick acted dishonestly in return for money or personal gain.
N G