01-30-2019, 06:17 PM
(This post was last modified: 01-30-2019, 06:22 PM by dicappatore.)
(01-30-2019, 12:34 PM)FaceInTheCrowd Wrote: I'm always wary of interviews where writers talk about plots after the fact. When have you ever heard one say "that didn't turn out the way I meant it to?"
I agree, as much as they might be ambiguous of how the planned arcs might have turn out. I can also insist, based on some of the ridiculous opinions pulled out of thin air, by some contributors on this Forum. These self proclaimed experts of the show would not supersede the expertise of these interviewed writers.
Now if the show was a non-fiction show based on past history. Take a series such as; "Medici: Masters of Florence". Now, that is a series based on actual characters from the past. In this situation, you can debate the writers arcs conflicting with actual character's history.
Even in such a case, writers can still claim they skewed from historical facts to make the show more interesting. I forgot the term they use. Poetic Justice comes to mind, but I might be wrong on the the actual term. At least, in these cases, you can debate them using the actual history of the characters arcs.
Since Grimm is pure fantasy set in a real world circumstances, Sorry Face, I give the writers more weight in their interpretations pre/post-aired episodes, over some self appointed experts on the series.
You know you are OLD, when you see the Slide Ruler you used in college selling in an ANTIQUE SHOP!!