06-08-2018, 12:43 AM
(This post was last modified: 06-08-2018, 01:05 AM by dicappatore.)
(06-07-2018, 08:40 PM)syscrash Wrote: New Guy you are missing the argument. To you the transcripts may support Juliette is an accomplice and an accessory. The argument is no where in the show does any character refer to or acts as if Juliette is an accomplice and an accessory.
Lets try another example, Diana. Is her growth abnormal? Is it accelerated? The answer is no. Not one character has mentioned, commented or reacted to what appears to be accelerated growth. You can post all of the text you want to establish a timeline to prove accelerated growth. but because nothing in the show addresses it . it does not exist.
In the aging question. When Diana asked about Misner. Abalind responded you might not remember that was a while ago and you where just a baby. In the Juliette situation they ended that arc with the statement of I did not know. The point being made, when the script states something that is a fact. When you draw and inference that is not fact. Labeling Juliette accomplice and an accessory is an inference since no where is that stated.
Hello, McFly?? I don't need a script to tell me about Diana's accelerated growth. All you have to do is watch the show's time line. She was born in Season 3. After Kelly and the gang kidnapped her only one season passed. She gets grabbed by Kenneth and Co. in Season 4, as per the time line between the two seasons only went by a year or so, we see Diana already as a 2 or 3 year old.
When Nick was moving out of "HIS HOUSE", after Adalind had Kelly, Adalind asked him how long had he lived in the house and he replied that "HE BOUGHT" the house six and a half years prior to "HIM SELLING HIS HOUSE". Ooops, more time line information. Do your "writers intent" math! JUST DO IT!
When Diana is reunited with Adalind during the Mayoral campaign she easily looks to be a pre-teen, 10 to 12 years old, yet the shows timeline only went by 2, maybe 3 years, TOTAL. We don't need dialogue to see that her growth was well accelerated. We all can do the "writers intent" math. Can you?
Let me direct you. She was born in Season 3. Kelly was born in Season 5. By season 6, how many years apart go you see Diana and Nick? I dare you to answer that question.
Hey, Mr. "writers intent"? Ever hear the term, "A picture paints a thousand words"? Can your infinite wisdom explain how a show's timeline of, 3 or 4 years at best, show us a girl as a pre-teen child and not see her growth was accelerated?
Well you missed that painting on the screen by a long long shot. Maybe you been exposed to that same jellyfish hallucinating toxin as some other viewers did.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0nx2FvEROSo
(06-07-2018, 09:02 PM)irukandji Wrote:(06-07-2018, 04:53 PM)New Guy Wrote: Iruk,
Actually I find no bliss in your ignorance. LOL!
Are you still stumped by the simple true false question I posed in #99?
FaceITC has yet to respond as well.
Perhaps the two of you can attain an answer. Perhaps not.
There, I provided you an excuse for your shortage of comprehension.
So do you say true or false?
N G
New Guy, you can't even get the species of jellyfish right. Why would anything else you say be correct?
BTW, it isn't only jellyfish that have no brains. I can think of a few here on the forum that fall right into that category, simply from reading their posts. Isn't it time for you to read your pms for further instructions?
Irukandji Jellyfish
They all look alike to me. Brainless, bloodless and heartlss.
You know you are OLD, when you see the Slide Ruler you used in college selling in an ANTIQUE SHOP!!