06-04-2018, 11:12 AM
With no new episodes being made, what else is there to do?
06-04-2018, 11:12 AM
With no new episodes being made, what else is there to do?
06-04-2018, 12:22 PM
(06-04-2018, 11:12 AM)FaceInTheCrowd Wrote: With no new episodes being made, what else is there to do? That is an easy question to answer. We can keep discussing on what happened on the show based on what we saw and how we interpreted what we saw and relegate Fan Fiction to it's appropriate topic instead of attempting to turning it to what we saw. Unlike, "One man's junk is another mans treasure". One contributors Fan Fiction NOT another mans reality.
You know you are OLD, when you see the Slide Ruler you used in college selling in an ANTIQUE SHOP!!
06-04-2018, 01:57 PM
If we did that, most discussions would end after three or four posts.
06-05-2018, 07:20 AM
(06-04-2018, 12:22 PM)dicappatore Wrote:Hamlet is still being discussed after 400 years. Trust me, I know this is not in the same class as Hamlet, but I expect that some people will still be "discussing" this for a few years more.(06-04-2018, 11:12 AM)FaceInTheCrowd Wrote: With no new episodes being made, what else is there to do?
06-05-2018, 09:09 AM
(This post was last modified: 06-05-2018, 09:15 AM by dicappatore.)
(06-05-2018, 07:20 AM)eric Wrote:(06-04-2018, 12:22 PM)dicappatore Wrote:Hamlet is still being discussed after 400 years. Trust me, I know this is not in the same class as Hamlet, but I expect that some people will still be "discussing" this for a few years more.(06-04-2018, 11:12 AM)FaceInTheCrowd Wrote: With no new episodes being made, what else is there to do? eric, last time i got to discussed Hamlet, a long time ago, I don't recall we got to improvise the scenes and dialogue. It would be interesting to discuss those plays with some of these contributors. I bet you they would call the musical "West Side Story" as "Romeo & Juliette"
You know you are OLD, when you see the Slide Ruler you used in college selling in an ANTIQUE SHOP!!
06-05-2018, 10:35 AM
(06-04-2018, 06:25 AM)irukandji Wrote:Hi Iruk,(06-04-2018, 05:50 AM)New Guy Wrote:(06-03-2018, 08:51 PM)irukandji Wrote: Juliette was neither an accessory nor an accomplice to any crime.Iruk, So the scene where Juliette sent the betrayal email was "supposition and speculation?" Was her information about Nick's house and the neighbors also "supposition and speculation?" Was she not in the Nick's house during this scene? Quote:Scene: Kelly and Diana pull up in front of Nick and Juliette's house.Was she not in the "get away car during this scene?: Quote:Scene: Juliette, Kenneth, and Diana are in a car after leaving Nick and Juliette's house.Did you ever actually watch Grimm? LOL! N G
06-05-2018, 10:47 PM
New Guy
Here is the problem with your position. Even the audience did not know Kenneth was going to kill Kelly until he did. Yet you go on and on as if Juliette planned some Kelly assassination. At no time was the audience even given the slightest hint that the assistance Kenneth was asking of Juliette would lead to death. In fact the show replayed the scene, having Chavez prove no one needed to die. Do you also realize Nick is the only character that has taken the position of blaming Juliette for Kelly's death. Consider this point when you blame Juliette. Everything she did could have ended with Kenneth chloroforming Kelly like Chavez did Nick. It was Kenneth that decided to decapitate Kelly. Even in the epilogue in case someone was not sure. In case someone may have thought Juliette could have been told off screen. The writers added the narrative confirming she did not know. What you are asking is for us to blame Juliette because her assistance was used to kill Kelly. It is one thing to provide assistance in executing the kill. It is another for what you did to be used to kill. In case you still don't see the difference lets use an example. It is one thing to load a gun hand it to someone and they use it to kill. It is another for someone to ask you to show them how to load a gun that they take an kill someone with. In both actions someone died because of your assistance. The difference, the first was the direct cause. The second was the consequence not the cause. We are responsible when was cause something. We are not responsible if our action have unforeseen consequences. Chavez proved Kelly dying was an unforeseen consequence of Juliettes assistance.
Embrace your inner Biest..... We all have one
(06-05-2018, 10:35 AM)New Guy Wrote: Hi Iruk, Wasn't it? Tell me how that made it apparent that Kelly was not only going to show up, but show up with Diana in tow. (06-05-2018, 10:35 AM)New Guy Wrote: Was her information about Nick's house and the neighbors also "supposition and speculation?" Did you know what Kenneth was going to do with that information? (06-05-2018, 10:35 AM)New Guy Wrote: Was she not in the Nick's house during this scene? She was. And? (06-05-2018, 10:35 AM)New Guy Wrote: Was she not in the "get away car during this scene?: She rode up in a car. I would expect her to leave the same way. (06-05-2018, 10:35 AM)New Guy Wrote: Did you ever actually watch Grimm? LOL! Hey New Guy, I never took you for a follower. I'm wondering why now you let the antics of simpletons on the forum direct not only you but your questions as well. No doubt you were pm'd and told to ask me this.
The best way to frustrate a cyberbully is to ignore him.
06-06-2018, 05:03 AM
(06-06-2018, 04:25 AM)irukandji Wrote:Iruk,(06-05-2018, 10:35 AM)New Guy Wrote: Hi Iruk, Do you realize that your above statements demonstrate you are clueless why I posed the questions to you. The scenes I listed in post #107 document the factual evidence that Juliette (AKA Hexenette) was as absolutely, irrefuably and beyond any reasonable doubt both an accessory and an accomplice to the murders of Kelly and the neighbors. Why are you unable to accept these facts? N G |
|