07-21-2018, 12:16 AM
(This post was last modified: 07-21-2018, 12:37 AM by dicappatore.)
(07-20-2018, 04:41 PM)irukandji Wrote:(07-20-2018, 04:29 PM)dicappatore Wrote: Just because you made a commitment, does not justify me making the same. You are welcomed to criticize me to your hearts content. Your problem will be, there is nothing to criticize about me. Sure you can disagree with an opinion, but you won't be able to criticize me about making shitz up, since I don't do that. Thats your specialty.
So, if you want to shut me up, try posting facts that are facts instead of crap. Crap, such as me making a commitment that I never made and I wont remind you of your shortcomings. Statements such as that statement on the 4 years Nick/Juliette relationship.
I had to point that out to back up what I am doing is not bulling anyone. All I was doing is showing you don't know what you are talking about, when it comes to the show, Grimm. If thats what you call bulling? Is just one more of your opinion being tried to be hawked off as a fact.
Oh, I'm not going to shut you up. There's no doubt in my mind that you're just totally thrilled over these recent posts. You love the conflict. So you'll continue with your little baiting and bullying tactics, adding your usual toilet bowl commentary in order to get noticed.
I do find it odd that you would even bring up the weapons thread in the first place, if you weren't interested in seeking some kind of commitment. It had nothing to do with the topic at hand, and in point of fact, no one was even discussing it. So you can't even claim that excuse. Maybe you'd like to explain that. After all, you're the one always pointing out how people bring up subjects not related to the topic but remain conspicuously silent when you are guilty of the same practice.
I also find it interesting that without the least bit of hesitation, you didn't deny insulting and harassing people on the forum. Oh, I know, you didn't come right out and admit it, but yet you managed to convey exactly how you deliberately choose to act toward others. Oh, wait, not all others. Just the others you've selected for targeting. Earmarks of a bully to be sure.
In any case, you've demonstrated just how meaningless your word is.
Hey, here is a novelty you can try. Next time you post something about the show Grimm and either me or someone else criticizes the facts you base your opinion on, and there are others, I am just relentless. instead of replying with "woe me, I am getting bullied" why don't you try to reply to your mistakes? By mistakes, I am not referring to opinions but the facts you use to make those opinions.
Case in point? Take the title of this thread. "Nick's obsession-demoting Juliette to normal human". How was Nick guilty of even contemplating such a idea. Yea he was trying to get her back to normal but wasn't Nick just continuing to follow up on what Juliette started to pursue weeks before she told him of her condition? If Nick is guilty of "demoting" her back to a human, wasn't she also guilty of the same for herself? What did she go to Sean and Henrietta for? To become a more powerful Hex or to get rid of her it? Or, as you prefer to call it, "demoting herself to a normal human".
DO you see how ridiculous your thread topic is? Now if you had not included the word "demote" in your title and maybe replaced it with "turn", "Nick's obsession to turn Juliette to normal human" then you would have made much more sense. Since it was obvious he was obsessed to get her humanity back. Not because he was jealous, which looks like thats you are insinuating, but because he loved her for what she had been for over 6 or more years of his life.
Have you real all the almost 30 pages of this thread? Have you tallied up how many postings are in favor of your claim and how many aren't? Better yet, have you tallied up how many postings are about the sake of arguing and name calling and bulling, instead of the thread topic. Have you wondered why there are so many threads about that? Because they are much more interesting than your topic.
So back to this thread. What scene or scenes or actions you can refer to where Nick was jealous, of her Hex-nesses (like my new term?) since it made her better than him. Didn't Nick look down on Hexenbiests? Wasn't that the natural order of Grimms vs Hexenbeists? You can't have it both ways. If Nick has a tendency to hate and look down to a Hex, why would he be jealous of her? If that was the case, he would have preferred to keep her at that lower level instead of elevating her back to a normal human.
If your going to use the excuse that he was jealous of her powers? I can show you by scenes and script many more times where he was willing to accept her as she was compared to that single scene when, as you say he walked out on her. In reality he went for a walk and got called out to another murder case. He did not move out and abandoned her which is exactly what she did the following evening.
Your other excuse that he spent one night on the sofa is another bad example since I can offset it with the many months he spent sleeping on that same sofa, trailer and Monroe's spare bedroom. Shouldn't that have been a great reason for forgiveness on her part? He slept on that couch one lousy night. Is that considered abandonment?
Like I have stated previously, if there is any obsession to be pointed out, one should look at the originator of this thread.
Quote: I AM JUST A GAP BETWEEN TWO REPLYING POSTINGS
(07-21-2018, 12:15 AM)syscrash Wrote:Quote: Your so call name calling is just one more of your opinion. In my world, it is a form of making a point.That statement says it all. yes I am sure in your world it does emphasize the point.
For one it is the study of Taxonomy not genealogy. Second the discussion is not about a particular class of mammals being they are real or fictional. The logic would hold true for species of marsupials as well as it does for the mythical wesen species. It would even hold true for species not yet discovered. It is the bases of how the science is defined.
But like I said you can tell your argument is weak because as always you resort to hyperbole to try and make your point. You then site this list of disciplinarians "Genealogy, Heraldry and the Biological Science". None of which have anything to do with the understanding of the classification of mammals. You then as usually add a disparaging comment "Doctorate on Wesen Physiology". Do you even know what the science of Physiology covers. Then why mention it when talking about Taxonomy.
Then with your great intellect on the few subjects you just stated, are you saying in the real world, surnames that are also names of particular species of animals do not exist? I was under the impression, Blutbaden was the plural of Blutbad.
Enlighten me how that is a classification of a Wesen branch or whatever other BS you are willing to declare instead of a particular Wesen? In this make believe world, Blutbad is a particular Wesen species. Blutbaden is its plural form. It's that simple. Ingratiate your self with all the babel you can contrive.
Do you know why i resort to;
Quote: as always you resort to hyperbole to try and make your point.
Because you keep posting stuff you don't read over and not realize how ridiculous your conclusions are.
You know you are OLD, when you see the Slide Ruler you used in college selling in an ANTIQUE SHOP!!