(05-10-2018, 06:50 AM)Henry of green Wrote:(05-10-2018, 04:28 AM)irukandji Wrote: Do you know what I think is strange on Nick's part? He pulls a gun on Juliette (when she woges into Adalind). But when Adalind waddles into the precinct, he does nothing?
In our society, just because a woman's pregnant, it doesn't mean she's suddenly rendered incapable of being dangerous. This is a witch with a history of crimes to her credit. Yet he does nothing because she's pregnant.
all Adalind would have to do is sniff the hat again and become someone else. She could easily stir up her usual round of trouble unpregnant and then return to her pregnant state and no one is the wiser.
Nick really is a doofus.
Are you seriously claiming Nick should have pulled a gun on his unborn son.
How exactly could Adalind just use her moms hat when Rosalee had it at the spice shop and Adalind had no idea where it was until Nick brought her to the spice shop after the precinct scene in 4x19. So unless she had a crystal ball how exactly could she use her mother’s hat to do a spell?
4x19 scene
That's my mother's book.
Do you have the hat? Yes.
Then all we need is my mother.
I thought your mother was dead.
Well, she couldn't help if she was alive.
Read more: https://www.springfieldspringfield.co.uk...ode=s04e19
To my mind Adalind made a fairly rational decision going to Nick considering Nick is Kelly's father and would have reason to protect her, she also brought the information about having a way to help Juliette as extra incentive for Nick to help her. Also considering Juliette nearly successfully killed her twice already clearly she figured she wouldn’t have much chance against Juliette alone while pregnant.
Um......I thought I was talking about Adalind being a danger. Did you, as usual, misinterpret?
Maybe you missed the episode, but Adalind committed murder while she was pregnant with Diana. Maybe you look at danger differently, but I see a murderer as a dangerous person. She isn't the Madonna just because she's pregnant.
(05-10-2018, 07:44 AM)dicappatore Wrote:(05-10-2018, 06:50 AM)Henry of green Wrote: Are you seriously claiming Nick should have pulled a gun on his unborn son.
How exactly could Adalind just use her moms hat when Rosalee had it at the spice shop and Adalind had no idea were it was until Nick brought her to the spice shop after the precinct scene in 4x19. So unless she had a crystal ball how exactly could she use her mother’s hat to do a spell.
4x19 scene
That's my mother's book.
Do you have the hat? Yes.
Then all we need is my mother.
I thought your mother was dead.
Well, she couldn't help if she was alive.
Read more: https://www.springfieldspringfield.co.uk...ode=s04e19
To my mind Adalind made a fairly rational decision going to Nick considering Nick is Kelly's father and would have reason to protect her, she also brought the information about having a way to help Juliette as extra incentive for Nick to help her. Also considering Juliette nearly successfully killed her twice already clearly she figured she wouldn’t have much chance against Juliette alone while pregnant.
Henry, the hat location is just one more of a pile of BS "SOME" use to make unfounded arguments, as I have posted on various other threads. This is how opinions are claimed to be facts that never existed, to back up arguments and opinions that are unfounded.
Here is a few more:
Quote:Do you know what I think is strange on Nick's part? He pulls a gun on Juliette (when she woge into Adalind). But when Adalind waddles into the precinct, he does nothing?
Made up assumption. Since when do Wesen Hexenbiest voge into another Wesen or Hexenbiest? Nick pulled his gun on Juliette, when he got home and Juliette was attacked because he thought was Adalind morphed into Juliette again. Once he realized, she was actually Juliette, he holstered the gun. When he saw Adalind in Sean's office, she was Adalind looking as Adalind and was not attacking anyone. She was there to tell Nick and Sean she was carrying Nick's baby. Why would he pull his gun out?
Quote:Adalind's own behavior in putting her child at risk by even coming to the precinct to seek Nick out in the first place.
Made up assumption. How is Adalind putting her unborn child in any danger by going to the police station? How are pregnant women in danger by showing up at the precinct? Did she expect for Nick to kill her with his unborn child?
Did she put herself in danger from Juliette? She did not expect to meet up with Juliette to be there. I must have missed the scene when Ken calls Adalind to tell her to go meet the recently bailed out Juliette ad the precinct. Unlike our sharp viewer that was able to come up with that conclusion.
This are just a few more examples of how trying to have a mature intelligent conversation with someone that just keeps making arguments on facts that did not exist, then expect to be respected as a serious contributor.
Now, we are all capable of making mistakes. The problem comes in is when these made up scenes are shown to not to exist, "SOME" cry out about being name called. Well maybe the name calling would not occur is the admission that they made a mistake, instead we get a reply such as "thats my opinion" or the argument is deflected into something else.
Has there ever been an admission of posted wrong scenes or dialogue that once confronted by many contributors with scene that can easily verified or quotes from the actual scripts?
Managed to get into the conversation, did you? Not for want of intelligent discussion but the usually bullying dialogue. How boring you continue to remain.
The best way to frustrate a cyberbully is to ignore him.