02-12-2018, 05:32 AM
(This post was last modified: 02-12-2018, 05:33 AM by dicappatore.)
(02-01-2018, 08:18 AM)Hell Rell Wrote: I'm saying it definitely felt like Renard was more on Team Grimm instead of just an ally that needed to be tolerated. They came too close to making him a good guy which is why his turn in season felt so jarring. It may have worked in season 3 but it was too late in season 5.
For example, Renard played a large role in Wesenrein. He was needed to rescue Monroe and it seemed like he wanted to do it just as much as everyone else. Renard looked like he was a part of the group. That swerve he made to BC came out of nowhere.
You make a great point HR. This is what the writers gave us about this character. Was it wrong or was it right? Was it confusing? Was it what most viewers wanted? Was it what most viewers did not want to see him as you stated? Or, does it even matter?
Once you starts to type down an analysis or formulate an opinion of this character or any other character, and try to interpret their behaviors, it should be based on what he did on the screen, oops, here comes the "snide" remarks. It should be based on what they do on the screen not what some dim-wit viewers fantasy can concoct based on made up facts.
If your opinion is challenged, use the scrip, deleted scenes, interviews of the cast and the whole creative team you can dig up to support your conclusion.
Take the latest stupid opinionated claim someone wrote about the PPD paying Nick's trip to Germany. That stupidity was concocted to support another idiocy that Nick owed Sean an explanation about the trip to Germany and it's purpose, or vice-versa. It is hard to keep up with such absurdity. Where is that scene, script, interview, any sliver of evidence or logic that can make that a reality. The character Nick didn't even use his true name to travel with.
Once the composer of that false reality was confronted with all the supporting evidence that it was inconceivable to even consider the possibility that the PPD paid for it. They squirm and weave and make up more lies, sometimes re-direct the argument or claim the writers must have omitted facts or blame it to poor writing, to try to prove their point.
To me, insulting one's intelligence is a lot worse that being sarcastic, making "snide" remarks or calling someone names, such as dim-witted. If you wish to insult someone's intelligence then be prepared to deal with the consequences.
I know, it is hard for some to think straight, being light headed, when the flow of blood bringing oxygen to the brain is cut off when one's foot is in one's MOUTH!
You know you are OLD, when you see the Slide Ruler you used in college selling in an ANTIQUE SHOP!!