(12-13-2017, 03:26 PM)Hell Rell Wrote: It's clear that Nick told Kelly the story and he decided to write the story on his own.
There's nothing in the series making it clear that Kelly decided to tell the story on his own.
(12-13-2017, 03:26 PM)Hell Rell Wrote: None of that necessitates Diana writing in the book or diminishes her bond with Nick because Kelly wrote in it instead.
It was the one thing she and Nick shared personally. If anyone should tell the story, it should have been her, not Kelly.
(12-13-2017, 03:26 PM)henry of green Wrote: The runners of the Grimm wikisite asked one of the Grimm writers over grimm wiki twitter account if Kelly was a grimm at the end and they responded back saying only grimms can write in the Grimm books so off course Kelly is a grimm.
Wouldn't Nick be the one to say who can or cannot write in his books?
(12-13-2017, 08:45 PM)rpmaluki Wrote: It isn't about withholding something from Diana for any reason and as I wrote before, Diana clearly didn't take it personally that Kelly has/can write in those books as a bona-fide Grimm while she must be content to tag along for wesen hunts.
So as the bona-fide grimm, you're saying it would be up to Kelly and Nick to kill any wesen while the rest of the gang looks on?
The best way to frustrate a cyberbully is to ignore him.