11-10-2015, 04:38 PM
(11-10-2015, 03:28 PM)New Guy Wrote: Hi Irukandji,
The favor of a reply is requested...
Are you saying Renard was entitled to cut off the ear of his hired reaper to help him "listen better"?
No, I am not saying that.
(11-10-2015, 03:28 PM)New Guy Wrote: I'll recognize and reply to your question:
Nick (and Renard) knew that simple compliance with the warrant would put the two Marshals in mortal danger. Nick wanted to protect them from Wemlinger. Renard didn't give a flip if Wemlinger killed them.
I could buy this argument if:
a) Hank found conclusive proof that Wemlinger murdered Childs, *not* his assumptions, his gut feeling, the fact he had his lucky rabbit's foot with him, whatever. Conclusive proof.
b) The two marshalls were careless and decided Wemlinger didn't need to be handcuffed.
c) The was only one marshall and he wasn't armed.
d) Wemlinger was a known serial killer.
e) The two marshalls were inexperienced greenhorns who took no precautions with Wemlinger.
None of the above applies.
Renard isn't at fault for this just because in your eyes he wasn't bleeding sympathy for the two marshalls.
Your argument is that all it would take is Renard warning the two marshalls and they might have lived. Well, Nick warned them and they still were murdered. If you're looking for someone to blame, blame Nick. He failed to warn them properly and they died as the result.
The best way to frustrate a cyberbully is to ignore him.