07-25-2018, 12:18 AM
(This post was last modified: 07-25-2018, 12:24 AM by dicappatore.)
WOW, talk about the pot calling the kettle black. Imagine if we were all being judged like Adalind by speaking what we believe as being liars. Aren't opinions about what we believe? Are people expressing opinions all liars?
Like some other poster said. This second pregnancy Adalind was experiencing was a completely different scenario. If anyone is unable to distinguish between the two pregnancies she was experiencing, what Can I say, except. What were you watching? What she believed is what she believed. Being wrong is not the lie. The lie part is when a belief is proven wrong and that person keeps insisting on that same belief..
I am probably the number one contributor accused of calling some other posters opinions as lies but that is just another lie. I never said opinions are lies. I call the fake facts that some opinions are based on as the lies, not the opinions. Those opinions are just baseless. May I explain?
Here is a great example, by some, on how an opinion based on a fake fact (a lie) becomes another fake fact that never occurred. This repetitive idea that Adalind betrayed Nick and the gang by not revealing what Kenneth and Verat was about to do with Juliette in tow.
When Adalind was last seen with Kenneth was just before she went to the police station to tell Nick she was carrying his child. At that point, she might have had the idea of Juliette being bailed out by Ken but who knew how Juliette would react. Even when Ken confronts Juliette after she is out, she is apprehensive.
Kenneth was gambling on her turning against the Grimm but had no clue if he would succeed and to what extent. He had no clue if Nick or Juliette could even get in touch with Kelly. As I recall, later on, Maybe it was a Verat agent that said, he was shocked how far she would go. How could Adalind ever be able to warn Nick and company of Kenneth's plans if even Kenneth had no idea on how things would unfold. Let alone if she would even align herself with the Royal family.
So, this whole so called claim of a fact, that Adalind betrayed Nick and the rest by not telling them what Ken was planning, is a great example of a fake fact turned into a baseless opinion that is claimed as factual in itself.
Again, the opinion is not the lie. The lie is the improvised fake logic that are the basis of a baseless opinion claimed as a fact. It doesn't matter how many times these contributors keeps repeating this big arse lie. Repetition of a fake fact based on an opinion based on another fake fact, does not make it the truth.
Adalind never betrayed Nick and the gang by not telling them of Kennett's plans because she had no idea on what was about to unfold, including Ken. The only ones that did were the writers.
Adalind believed what she was expressing based on her belies of her current situations to be true. Hence, she was NOT lying.
WOW, it is possible to also agree with you. I also agree on your point in case I wasn't clear enough to express it as you just did.
I am sure you meant to say "I see a drunk thinks" instead of "I see a drink thinks"
Like some other poster said. This second pregnancy Adalind was experiencing was a completely different scenario. If anyone is unable to distinguish between the two pregnancies she was experiencing, what Can I say, except. What were you watching? What she believed is what she believed. Being wrong is not the lie. The lie part is when a belief is proven wrong and that person keeps insisting on that same belief..
I am probably the number one contributor accused of calling some other posters opinions as lies but that is just another lie. I never said opinions are lies. I call the fake facts that some opinions are based on as the lies, not the opinions. Those opinions are just baseless. May I explain?
Here is a great example, by some, on how an opinion based on a fake fact (a lie) becomes another fake fact that never occurred. This repetitive idea that Adalind betrayed Nick and the gang by not revealing what Kenneth and Verat was about to do with Juliette in tow.
Quote:Several people have point out, that Adalind did not tell Nick what Kenneth was up to. Could it be she did not tell him, because she felt Kenneth was her best option to get Diana back to Portland. Remember when Nick returned from the attack. Adalind only concern was that Nick did not get Diana.
When Adalind was last seen with Kenneth was just before she went to the police station to tell Nick she was carrying his child. At that point, she might have had the idea of Juliette being bailed out by Ken but who knew how Juliette would react. Even when Ken confronts Juliette after she is out, she is apprehensive.
Kenneth was gambling on her turning against the Grimm but had no clue if he would succeed and to what extent. He had no clue if Nick or Juliette could even get in touch with Kelly. As I recall, later on, Maybe it was a Verat agent that said, he was shocked how far she would go. How could Adalind ever be able to warn Nick and company of Kenneth's plans if even Kenneth had no idea on how things would unfold. Let alone if she would even align herself with the Royal family.
So, this whole so called claim of a fact, that Adalind betrayed Nick and the rest by not telling them what Ken was planning, is a great example of a fake fact turned into a baseless opinion that is claimed as factual in itself.
Again, the opinion is not the lie. The lie is the improvised fake logic that are the basis of a baseless opinion claimed as a fact. It doesn't matter how many times these contributors keeps repeating this big arse lie. Repetition of a fake fact based on an opinion based on another fake fact, does not make it the truth.
Adalind never betrayed Nick and the gang by not telling them of Kennett's plans because she had no idea on what was about to unfold, including Ken. The only ones that did were the writers.
Adalind believed what she was expressing based on her belies of her current situations to be true. Hence, she was NOT lying.
(07-24-2018, 03:50 AM)syscrash Wrote: dicappatore the drunk analogy was very apropo. The one difference I see is a drink thinks they have the ability to back up their actions. A hexenbiest has the ability to back up their actions.
WOW, it is possible to also agree with you. I also agree on your point in case I wasn't clear enough to express it as you just did.
I am sure you meant to say "I see a drunk thinks" instead of "I see a drink thinks"
You know you are OLD, when you see the Slide Ruler you used in college selling in an ANTIQUE SHOP!!