04-07-2019, 05:09 PM
(This post was last modified: 04-07-2019, 05:19 PM by dicappatore.)
LOL, What is really ridiculous with this whole argument about Kelly and how she was protecting Diana is, and here we go again, someone trying to change the story line with a series of events that are translated and twisted into inconsequential series of events that make no flocking sense, whatsoever.
OK, so let’s say, this dumb-ass argument of Kelly being a bad decision maker and failing to protect Diana. So, now what? What has this idiotic argument proven? So Kelly is a lousy decision making lousy Grimm, so now what? Do you win the flocking lottery and can retire for life? What is the point?
Then we get "pointdexter" to chime in on how lousy the writers were on character development without taking into account the best they could do to write in a character who's actress was unavailable, do to prior professional commitments to another project she was working on.
So whats the point? You’s (NYC word, possessive and plural version of “you”) have assumed you had bad writers write up a lousy undeveloped character. Now what? My TV has an on and off switch, does yours?
OK, so let’s say, this dumb-ass argument of Kelly being a bad decision maker and failing to protect Diana. So, now what? What has this idiotic argument proven? So Kelly is a lousy decision making lousy Grimm, so now what? Do you win the flocking lottery and can retire for life? What is the point?
Then we get "pointdexter" to chime in on how lousy the writers were on character development without taking into account the best they could do to write in a character who's actress was unavailable, do to prior professional commitments to another project she was working on.
So whats the point? You’s (NYC word, possessive and plural version of “you”) have assumed you had bad writers write up a lousy undeveloped character. Now what? My TV has an on and off switch, does yours?
You know you are OLD, when you see the Slide Ruler you used in college selling in an ANTIQUE SHOP!!