(06-19-2018, 10:41 AM)New Guy Wrote: Iruk,
My post #175 on this thread posed four simple questions. The first asked you to name the "friends" (if any, other than Rosalee) who visited Hexenette in jail. The other three were simple yes or no questions.
Although I have requested your reply to post #99 on "Diana and the 'Other Mommy'" you have yet to do so.
You claim that "[I] don't always respond to questions that are posed directly to [me]" however you have not told me what question to me was not answered.
You have on many occasions rejected factual evidence from me and others on the Forum claiming Grimm Wiki "Transcripts" and "Synopses" are "Opinions" not facts. Then when someone asks you for facts to support your opinions you provide nothing.
N G
New Guy-
I notice that you are often the only one who doesn't provide a background for your questions. You start out with some definition or two, and then throw out questions which seem to have no reasoning to them. Why is that?
For reference, I'll start with these two:
"So is Kenneth your hero? Did he bail her out to help promote peace and good will?"
Now..............there was nothing in your post that indicated why you're posing these questions to me. The only answer I can come up with is that you're once again being snarky and you really don't want an answer, at least not a serious one.
So my question to you is this: Do you really believe anyone should have to respond to ridiculous questions that have no merit and why?
For me, a yes or no answer to this is **not** acceptable.
The best way to frustrate a cyberbully is to ignore him.