02-13-2018, 11:09 PM
(This post was last modified: 02-14-2018, 12:16 AM by Henry of green.)
(02-13-2018, 05:26 PM)irukandji Wrote:(02-13-2018, 10:57 AM)eric Wrote: Maybe a person is assumed innocent until proven innocent in a court of law (not always in the court of public opinion), but when you are talking personal relationship, the opposite is more the rule. When suspicions about your intimate "friend" come up he/she bears the burden of proof of innocence. I think we have seen situations where we all say "how can he/she so stupid to believe THAT story?". We usually end up being correct.
Exactly. When Juliette became a hexenbiest you could tell right off Nick considered her guilty. He considered her so guilty he became obsessed with "fixing" her.
(02-13-2018, 05:33 AM)Henry of green Wrote: At least Adalind left Nick with a note explaining why she had to leave to protect the children and him and also saying she loved him.
He's the grimm. Does he really need Adalind, the mouse in the corner. to be his protectress? Really, henry, I thought your argument would have held more merit than that.
I thought your response would be better, even Eve proved herself next to useless against Boneparte. and would’ve have went to her grave without Nick and the sticks help. So yes Nick needed Adalind to help him and that’s exactly what she did, what exactly is your problem with that, by the way it’s purley your opinion Adalind was a mouse. By the way didn’t the guy you often refer to as doofus Nick have to protect the all powerful Eve from Bonaparte after the ass kicking her gave her at the precinct.