(11-27-2015, 06:46 PM)Belle Wrote: I guess that means we still don't know what kind of wesen baby Rosalee and Monroe will have, but I hope we get to find out because now I'm more curious than ever.
Of course people who are not selfish might think, gee why would I deliberately mate with someone when that deliberate and non-accidental act will lead to the procreation of a child with likely genetically induced challenges.
If Roselle and Monroe have strong reason to suspect a natural child of theirs would have some likely issues as a result of their mating, I would say it would be irresponsible and selfish to reproduce. They should opt for adoption. Maybe Kelly would be a likely candidate or more likely those lost children.
For example there is this proud community organizer called Trudy Suggs, who is congenitally deaf, as is her husband. She decided to knowingly have 4 children by her husband, guaranteeing that all four children would be born deaf in order to perpetuate her goal of creating a new political class of people dependent on Government to further her political philosophy. In my estimation, 100% selfish. I would like to think Rosalee and Monroe are above that type of personal pettiness. If they think their natural child may have issues, perhaps they should consider adoption; they do have a lot of love to give.
All of this posted above assumes that a deliberate mating would likely result in a child with genetically induced issues.