There is more then one solution to a problem. The most simple would have been to leave with Juliette and work out the reason for the anger. Nick and Juliette could then also work out why being mad at Adalind should not be taken out on the child. Just like Juliette came to that realization about Diana. This idea about Juliette doing something to Adalind would go against her court case, make no sense. seeing as Juliette would not physically touch her. Exactly what would someone say in court. Juliette broke Adalind's arm from across the room. That is the same problem with the bar incident. How could any explain how someone as small as Juliette could throw someone across the room.
I have been trying to figure out why people want Juliette to be a villain. WAs she angry. Yes she was very angry. Did she burn the trailer, yes and that was wrong. It was also a crime. But as for the rest. All the accusations of Juliette planing to kill kelly and the neighbors all use assumptions to try and prove the point. You can not quote one line where she planned to kill the neighbors and kelly. The dialog only states she helped plan to get Diana from Kelly for the Royals. You find just one line where Juliette says she plans to kill. And I will be happy to agree with your assumptions. Sure she is all powerful. But her not intervening does not mean she agreed with Kenneth's actions. It just means she choose not to be a hero. The same would be true if you and your friends planned to rob a liquor store. They ended up shooting up the place. You did not kill the clerk if you did not try and stop them. Even if you all had guns when you walked into the place. Does not mean you planned or had the intent on killing anyone. But based on the analogies I keep reading. Because Kenneth and his men had guns, it is a fore gone conclusion that Juliette had intended on killing everyone. Even in the scenario I created cooperation would lead to you being charged with the robbery but not the murder. There are many real life cases to back up that reality.
The idea that I am trying to exonerate Juliette is a misguided assumption. Like I said burning the trailer, not a good thing. Her actions at the spice shop again not a good thing. Yes she should not have thrown Rosalee, that was an excessive reaction. but then Nick and Hank pulling their guns was even worse. Like it is said never pull a gun you have no intention of using. She was unarmed. How would they have explained why the shot her. This again another situation where when Juliette said no they should have left it at that instead of escalating the situation. Why do people think Nick and the group have the right to force their wishes on someone else. Because someone may figure it would help the other person. That still does not give them the right to try and make them. But that is people entire argument, that they where trying to help Juliette. For one the suppression would not have help the situation. The only help would have been a cure and that was not or was there a cure.
As for Kelly and the Neighbors. Juliette may have made the final actions possible. That does not mean she planned the final out come. Plus none of that would have been possible if Adalind had told Nick what Kenneth was planning. Adalind knew more about what Kenneth was planning then Juliette did. Adalind had seen the level of violence Kenneth was capable of. Juliette had not seen or heard of a single act of violence perpetrated by Kenneth.
My entire argument is the imbalance of demonizing Juliette while exonerating Adalind. The entire situation is the fault Adalind and Juliette. Everything Juliette did was only possible by Adalinds previous action. Had Adalind not attacked Juliette to punish Nick, Juliette would have never had anger towards Adalind. If Adalind had not poisned Hank Nick would have never taken her powers. If Adalind had not taken Nick powers Juliette would have never became a hexenbiest. Had Adadlind not told the Royals the Kelly had Diana, the Royals would have never went after Kelly. If Adalind had not sleep with Nick she would not have had his kid, causing Juliette to be mad enough to burn the trailer. That is not to say that Juliette is not responsible for her actions. But if you are going to chastise Juliette for what she did. You also have to look at why and how she got there.
The other thing that I have a problem with is. Because Adalind has Nick son and said she was sorry, she is seen as redeemed. Eve saves their lives, risk death yet she is still seen as the worst villain an nonredeemable. I am one that finds actions of contrition for more credible then words. What Eve did at the factory far out ways anything that Adalind could ever say.
I have been trying to figure out why people want Juliette to be a villain. WAs she angry. Yes she was very angry. Did she burn the trailer, yes and that was wrong. It was also a crime. But as for the rest. All the accusations of Juliette planing to kill kelly and the neighbors all use assumptions to try and prove the point. You can not quote one line where she planned to kill the neighbors and kelly. The dialog only states she helped plan to get Diana from Kelly for the Royals. You find just one line where Juliette says she plans to kill. And I will be happy to agree with your assumptions. Sure she is all powerful. But her not intervening does not mean she agreed with Kenneth's actions. It just means she choose not to be a hero. The same would be true if you and your friends planned to rob a liquor store. They ended up shooting up the place. You did not kill the clerk if you did not try and stop them. Even if you all had guns when you walked into the place. Does not mean you planned or had the intent on killing anyone. But based on the analogies I keep reading. Because Kenneth and his men had guns, it is a fore gone conclusion that Juliette had intended on killing everyone. Even in the scenario I created cooperation would lead to you being charged with the robbery but not the murder. There are many real life cases to back up that reality.
The idea that I am trying to exonerate Juliette is a misguided assumption. Like I said burning the trailer, not a good thing. Her actions at the spice shop again not a good thing. Yes she should not have thrown Rosalee, that was an excessive reaction. but then Nick and Hank pulling their guns was even worse. Like it is said never pull a gun you have no intention of using. She was unarmed. How would they have explained why the shot her. This again another situation where when Juliette said no they should have left it at that instead of escalating the situation. Why do people think Nick and the group have the right to force their wishes on someone else. Because someone may figure it would help the other person. That still does not give them the right to try and make them. But that is people entire argument, that they where trying to help Juliette. For one the suppression would not have help the situation. The only help would have been a cure and that was not or was there a cure.
As for Kelly and the Neighbors. Juliette may have made the final actions possible. That does not mean she planned the final out come. Plus none of that would have been possible if Adalind had told Nick what Kenneth was planning. Adalind knew more about what Kenneth was planning then Juliette did. Adalind had seen the level of violence Kenneth was capable of. Juliette had not seen or heard of a single act of violence perpetrated by Kenneth.
My entire argument is the imbalance of demonizing Juliette while exonerating Adalind. The entire situation is the fault Adalind and Juliette. Everything Juliette did was only possible by Adalinds previous action. Had Adalind not attacked Juliette to punish Nick, Juliette would have never had anger towards Adalind. If Adalind had not poisned Hank Nick would have never taken her powers. If Adalind had not taken Nick powers Juliette would have never became a hexenbiest. Had Adadlind not told the Royals the Kelly had Diana, the Royals would have never went after Kelly. If Adalind had not sleep with Nick she would not have had his kid, causing Juliette to be mad enough to burn the trailer. That is not to say that Juliette is not responsible for her actions. But if you are going to chastise Juliette for what she did. You also have to look at why and how she got there.
The other thing that I have a problem with is. Because Adalind has Nick son and said she was sorry, she is seen as redeemed. Eve saves their lives, risk death yet she is still seen as the worst villain an nonredeemable. I am one that finds actions of contrition for more credible then words. What Eve did at the factory far out ways anything that Adalind could ever say.
Embrace your inner Biest..... We all have one