12-06-2018, 06:35 PM
(This post was last modified: 12-06-2018, 06:49 PM by Henry of green.)
(12-06-2018, 06:23 PM)irukandji Wrote:(12-06-2018, 05:09 PM)Henry of green Wrote: It’s not ambiguous at all it would become ambiguous however if enough was added to the end but just saying something is fair is basically saying they are right, if the writers wanted it to be ambiguous they would have used that’s fair enough but they didn’t they just said it’s a fair statment.
Telling the interviewer he/she is right by stating "it's fair" does not fit in this instance. However, you mentioned a definition of fair as "reasonable" and that would fit very well here. They're telling the interviewer his/her sense is reasonable. They're just acknowledging the interviewer's perception, and remaining ambiguous.
Yes it does fit this instances when someone just says that’s fair it means it’s true you
If they added it’s fair enough that would fit the definition of reasonable much more and you might actually have a point but you don’t have a leg to stand on here
It’s not ambiguous whatsoever you just want it to be ambiguous but it’s not.
At the end of the final episode, we get the sense that Nick and Adalind are still together. Is that fair?
JK and DG: Yes, that's fair.
This Cambridge definition of Fair to say fits what G&k are saying much more.
Interviewer question is that fair- Cambridge defention of fair to say is below , your seriously telling me that doesn’t meet the definition.
is that fair to say
it is true to say:
I think it's fair to say (that) you've done less of the work than I have.