(12-06-2018, 02:20 PM)N_grimm Wrote: henry has already answered this. I will just add that I think it’s strange that you accuse others, without putting proofs on the table, of ignoring parts of an interview or other interviews. I do not know of ANY interviews that contradict each other on the question of Nick and Adalind still being together.
Consider the question from the interviewer. They're not asking a direct question. What they are stating is "Is it fair that we get the sense that Nick and Adalind are still together".
DG and JK state, Yes, that's fair (that you get the sense that Nick and Adalind are still together)".
The whole question revolves around the interviewer's 'sense' that Nick and Adalind are still together. DG and JK are conceding with the interviewer's sense. No where are they stating that the two of them are together at the end of the series.
Now before you and henry go flying off the handle, consider that G&K are notorious for answering questions and yet at the same time, not answering questions. The question was a stupid one. Most people who give a rat's patoot about the Nick/Adalind relationship would just blurt out the question.....'Are Nick and Adalind still together at the end of the series?' The answer would be Yes or No, not some dumbness about their sense of them being together and ending the question with 'is it fair?'
I am in no way trying to start yet another boring Nick loves Adalind argument. I was merely pointing out that it was not a conclusive statement. I was also pointing out that these interviews are different.
You and henry were completely familiar with this interview. You both were quick to point it out right away. What I am stating is I have never seen either one of you quote this particular interview. Now, if you can show me the post where you both have quoted it in the past, I'll eat my words. No big deal.
Finally, when JK answers a question one way, and DG chimes in with something completely different about certain characters, i.e. 'whatever you think happened, happened', they are not in agreement with one another.
You might be able to tack that into the script somehow and declare it official canon. To me, it speaks of these people once again being glib and pulling the viewers' chains. They do not care at that point who's sleeping with who 20 years later, who's hanging around, who's died, whatever.
(12-06-2018, 02:20 PM)N_grimm Wrote: Is this a joke?
Not in the least. I have often wondered if Nick used the staff to conjure up another Airstream.
The best way to frustrate a cyberbully is to ignore him.