(04-11-2017, 04:45 AM)irukandji Wrote: Okay, so we have baby Kelly, sleeping together, and some tragedies. I'm sure there are more tragedies, but here's what I've come up with. Nick lost his aunt. Adalind was involved in that one. Adalind lost her hexenbiest. Nick was involved in that one. Adalind lost Diana. Nick was involved in that one. Nick lost his mother. Adalind was involved in that one. Nick lost his Grimm. Adalind was involved in that one. The only thing either one of them ever gained out of the relationship was baby Kelly and even that is a very gray area for these two.
Again, I'm not being sarcastic. I just don't see anything that led to me to believe that this is somehow a complex relationship with involving two people who have so much in common.
I do not agree with some of the sentences. The past actions are very debatable on who really is to be blamed.
Nick lost his aunt - Not Adalind nor Renard were involved in the death of his aunt. She was already dieing. The Grimm reapers fight may have just speedened up her death. Yes Adalind tried to kill her by order of Renard, but did not succeed. I do not see how not succeding killed Aunt Marie.
Adalind lost Diana - Renard was more involved and Renard was the reason. He gave the final go ahead for Diana to be taken. Nick simply adviced him. If Renard had said no, and decided to protect the child himself with Adalind. Nick and others would have had a plan B. Nick understood it was not his call to make but Renards.
Nick lost his mother - Adalind was no where close to involved. This was Juliette all the way, pure and simple. This had Juliette written all over it.
Nick lost his Grimm - Adalind, yes Granted for good reasons so she thought. (The only one I agree on)