03-15-2017, 03:21 PM
(03-15-2017, 03:15 PM)MarylikesGrimm Wrote:(03-15-2017, 03:08 PM)irukandji Wrote:(03-15-2017, 03:02 PM)MarylikesGrimm Wrote:(03-15-2017, 03:00 PM)irukandji Wrote:(03-15-2017, 02:43 PM)MarylikesGrimm Wrote: I do not agree since Elizabeth is Sean's mother and Sean told her he wanted to Nick get his powers back. Elizabeth is not neutral and she was not planning on coming back either and she was a hexenbiest too. Elizabeth bias was for Nick to get his powers back.
If Adalind's spell was really life threatening then she would have wanted him to stay human and told Sean that to since doing the same spell again may only add side effects yet not get rid of the earlier ones.
You're saying Nick going back to being a grimm was *just as* dangerous as Nick stating he didn't want to do anything and be a human. That means he was no better off if he became a grimm or remained human.
If one is as dangerous as the other, that means Adalind's spell had consequences *besides* taking Nick's grimm away.
Yes, it has side effects but death was not seen as likely.
So what you're saying is Elizabeth was not helping Nick, but helping Sean? In other words then, she deliberately kept Juliette's side effects secret in order to deceive Nick into becoming a Grimm?
Yes, imo she down played the side effects and never offered any suggests to help Juliette even though Sean.
Well, that's why we differ. That theory has been brought up before. It's an interesting theory, but as far as I remember, no one could find any facts to substantiate it.
The best way to frustrate a cyberbully is to ignore him.