01-22-2017, 10:00 AM
(01-22-2017, 09:50 AM)irukandji Wrote:Agreed to disagree. Nick had his gun on Sean before Sean so if anyone was going to be shot Nick had first crack he could have shot Sean when he came out the door to the roof, but shooting Sean didn't help getting Sean on board with a deal did help.(01-22-2017, 09:40 AM)jsgrimm45 Wrote:(01-22-2017, 09:25 AM)Kathryn Wooten Wrote:Renard knew which side his bread was buttered on so no her would not have try to help Kelly if need, likely Adalind and maybe Diana would have but not Renard.(01-22-2017, 09:02 AM)irukandji Wrote:(01-22-2017, 09:00 AM)MarylikesGrimm Wrote: How? The guards are control by BC were missing because of Nick only. If Nick had not forced Renard out of the mayor's office BC would have send more guards to replace them so they could have controlled Renard.
Oh, sorry. I misunderstood your question. Let me rephrase. Renard would not have stood idly by and let BC take Kelly. He would have fought them. He might not win, but then who would? However, he would have fought them just the same.
I believe he would have taken a stand after what happened to miesner...no Sean would not survive, but I think going after the children would have gave Renard the courage to stand up to Conrad.
lol, like always, we agree to disagree. I believe he would have because Renard has often taken an opposite stand. It was just discussed yesterday about a stand he took. He opted not to shoot Nick, even though he could have done so easily. Renard would have fought BC taking little Kelly, of that I have no doubt.