Not being able to take the ring off, doesn't mean not being able to leave Sean. There was also another pic that showed Adalind and Diana at the loft eating at the table. I think at the first chance of getting herself away from the mayor, Adalind is going to stay away unless they bounce her off between the loft and Sean's house on a continuous basis but I highly doubt that.
10-01-2016, 06:51 AM (This post was last modified: 10-01-2016, 06:52 AM by jsgrimm45.)
(10-01-2016, 06:02 AM)rpmaluki Wrote: Not being able to take the ring off, doesn't mean not being able to leave Sean. There was also another pic that showed Adalind and Diana at the loft eating at the table. I think at the first chance of getting herself away from the mayor, Adalind is going to stay away unless they bounce her off between the loft and Sean's house on a continuous basis but I highly doubt that.
Agree the ring doesn't keep her with Sean only keeps her from removing it. Now if Conrad was still in the picture yes he would keep her with Renard but now that he is gone don't think the ring binds her to Sean Could be wrong guess we will find out. Now we know Renard wants to use (been said) LBB to kill Nick so could this be his plan send her and Diana to Nick's? If we see Adalind and LBB at the fome does this mean Nick is there? He could use the tunnels to come and go. So is this episode a threat on Nick at the fome from Diana?
I do see Diana playing Adalind to get what she wants, her parents together. She got rid of Rachel and "for" Adalind and now all that's left is to get rid of Nick for Sean.
(10-01-2016, 05:38 AM)Kathryn Wooten Wrote: don't believe she can leave without getting the cursed ring off her finger without hurting the kids as Conrad had threaten if she took off the ring
(10-01-2016, 06:02 AM)rpmaluki Wrote: Not being able to take the ring off, doesn't mean not being able to leave Sean. There was also another pic that showed Adalind and Diana at the loft eating at the table. I think at the first chance of getting herself away from the mayor, Adalind is going to stay away unless they bounce her off between the loft and Sean's house on a continuous basis but I highly doubt that.
(10-01-2016, 06:51 AM)jsgrimm45 Wrote: Agree the ring doesn't keep her with Sean only keeps her from removing it. Now if Conrad was still in the picture yes he would keep her with Renard but now that he is gone don't think the ring binds her to Sean Could be wrong guess we will find out. Now we know Renard wants to use (been said) LBB to kill Nick so could this be his plan send her and Diana to Nick's? If we see Adalind and LBB at the fome does this mean Nick is there? He could use the tunnels to come and go. So is this episode a threat on Nick at the fome from Diana?
I’m confused and wonder if the scenes are being misinterpreted or if, as usual, statements made by G & K are full of hooey. G & K said the ring will cause problems for Nick & Adalind in S6. If the ring doesn’t prevent Adalind from leaving Renard and/or being with someone else, what was the point of the ring? Because otherwise, Bonaparte’s threat that the children will be harmed if she removes the ring was simply Bonaparte forcing Adalind to wear a piece of jewelry - not that she remain with Renard. If the spell Bonaparte put on the ring died with him, why can’t Adalind simply take it off? If she can’t, isn’t the spell still in place? Which should mean she can’t leave Renard, or at the very least, can’t be with someone else. Is that maybe the ring problem G & K referred to - Adalind can physically leave, but she can’t be intimate with someone else without threatening the children?
Could this be G & K’s method of keeping Adalind out of the relationship picture while they concentrate on Nick/Juliette, much the same way they kept Juliette as Eve out of the relationship picture so they could concentrate on Nick/Adalind in S5?
"If my devils are to leave me, I am afraid my angels will take flight as well." Rainer Maria Rilke
(10-02-2016, 07:48 AM)Robyn Wrote: Could this be G & K’s method of keeping Adalind out of the relationship picture while they concentrate on Nick/Juliette, much the same way they kept Juliette as Eve out of the relationship picture so they could concentrate on Nick/Adalind in S5?
Personally, I'd be more comfortable with the former than the latter. But either way, Nick would be stuck with the woman who sexually violated him, or the woman who sold his mother out. G&K have really written themselves into a corner with this one.
(09-30-2016, 05:40 AM)rpmaluki Wrote: That's a good thing. It's so easy for it to be taken at face value but what could it be referring to if not the literal meaning?
It could be about a crime related to a wesen that eats the romantic partner as breakfast after a night of love.
Eating a romantic partner sounds more like what the title refers to. It is something that Grimm would do.
(09-30-2016, 05:40 AM)rpmaluki Wrote: That's a good thing. It's so easy for it to be taken at face value but what could it be referring to if not the literal meaning?
It could be about a crime related to a wesen that eats the romantic partner as breakfast after a night of love.
Eating a romantic partner sounds more like what the title refers to. It is something that Grimm would do.
Don't you mean wesen? A wesen could eat their partner for breakfast, not grimms.
(10-02-2016, 11:54 PM)FaceInTheCrowd Wrote: Adelind moves back to the fome with Kelly and Diana in ep 4.
hmmmm Diana will not be happy with that......does give Sean some much needed freedom and maybe a new girl on the side..now that he is not under Diana's prying eyes