01-18-2016, 03:56 PM
(This post was last modified: 01-18-2016, 04:24 PM by Adriano Neres Rodrigues.)
Warning to readers
+++
This is a kind of spin of the thread Sean Renard – understanding his past, foreseeing his future
http://grimmforum.com/forum/Thread-Sean-...his-future
Which is a generic analysis of the character.
In this new thread I would like to propose a specific theory for debate. I am not necessarily worried about the viability of the theory. I am more interested in the fun of the speculation and in the possibility of closing the possible plot holes.
+++
In the last four seasons we saw Sean making very interesting allies. He started as a royal. He put Adelaind against Nick transforming them in enemies. He also (probably) out Nick in royals radar creating a new powerful enemy for Nick. Then Sean turned against the apparently old allies (Adelaind and mainly the royals) and used it as an argument to turn Nick his allied (since both had the same enemies). Sean then became allied of the resistance, but not too much allied. I think it is interesting the process: choose a target (Nick, for example), put his own enemies against the target (the royals, in this case) and then use it as argument to become allied of the target. It is a very good manipulation of the target.
I think it is not hard to think that Sean may still have allies inside his family. A person that maybe didn’t agree with the way his treated by his father and his brother. Going very far in the left field, I thought about Viktor. When Sean ordered the killing of Eric, he opened a way for Viktor to the crown. In a certain way, when Viktor exchanged the king’s death with Diana to the resistance, he eliminated a threat to Sean (the king) and to his daughter (no one else in the family will want try to find Diana, at least until Viktor was the king.
Now the big conspiracy idea: what if Viktor and Sean had a deal for one them (Viktor) take the crown of the Renard’s family and use it to try to get the four keys with the royal families while the other (Sean) was responsible for taking the three missing keys? Sean has alliance with a grimm and with the resistance. I think he imagine the missing key will eventually pass by the hands of those two players. Nick has already two. And now They have a connection with the HW that may have a condition to take the other one missing.
In this scenario, Viktor and Sean would have planned that Sean would be the families enemy since the beginning to attract the grimm alliance while Viktor would stay inside the family preparing the uprising and waiting the right moment to kill the king. The uprising would be a threat against the other families… like: We need all the keys together to destroy the uprising. In the end they may be trying to assume not only Renards family, but also the treasure and then have power over all the families. Almost all events would have being planned by them like Juliette transformation, Adelaind taking Nick’s power and then Sean’s mother helping Nick to get it back… and so on.
Here is the question: This plot has many holes, but just for fun… can we close them?
+++
This is a kind of spin of the thread Sean Renard – understanding his past, foreseeing his future
http://grimmforum.com/forum/Thread-Sean-...his-future
Which is a generic analysis of the character.
In this new thread I would like to propose a specific theory for debate. I am not necessarily worried about the viability of the theory. I am more interested in the fun of the speculation and in the possibility of closing the possible plot holes.
+++
In the last four seasons we saw Sean making very interesting allies. He started as a royal. He put Adelaind against Nick transforming them in enemies. He also (probably) out Nick in royals radar creating a new powerful enemy for Nick. Then Sean turned against the apparently old allies (Adelaind and mainly the royals) and used it as an argument to turn Nick his allied (since both had the same enemies). Sean then became allied of the resistance, but not too much allied. I think it is interesting the process: choose a target (Nick, for example), put his own enemies against the target (the royals, in this case) and then use it as argument to become allied of the target. It is a very good manipulation of the target.
I think it is not hard to think that Sean may still have allies inside his family. A person that maybe didn’t agree with the way his treated by his father and his brother. Going very far in the left field, I thought about Viktor. When Sean ordered the killing of Eric, he opened a way for Viktor to the crown. In a certain way, when Viktor exchanged the king’s death with Diana to the resistance, he eliminated a threat to Sean (the king) and to his daughter (no one else in the family will want try to find Diana, at least until Viktor was the king.
Now the big conspiracy idea: what if Viktor and Sean had a deal for one them (Viktor) take the crown of the Renard’s family and use it to try to get the four keys with the royal families while the other (Sean) was responsible for taking the three missing keys? Sean has alliance with a grimm and with the resistance. I think he imagine the missing key will eventually pass by the hands of those two players. Nick has already two. And now They have a connection with the HW that may have a condition to take the other one missing.
In this scenario, Viktor and Sean would have planned that Sean would be the families enemy since the beginning to attract the grimm alliance while Viktor would stay inside the family preparing the uprising and waiting the right moment to kill the king. The uprising would be a threat against the other families… like: We need all the keys together to destroy the uprising. In the end they may be trying to assume not only Renards family, but also the treasure and then have power over all the families. Almost all events would have being planned by them like Juliette transformation, Adelaind taking Nick’s power and then Sean’s mother helping Nick to get it back… and so on.
Here is the question: This plot has many holes, but just for fun… can we close them?