04-19-2018, 12:10 AM
(04-18-2018, 05:00 PM)syscrash Wrote:Quote:I make a statement and use the definitions to support my statement. That is the "coherent argument to support My position" And I have to re-post it because it doesn't seem to sink in to your mind set. This is why now you are arguing about the argument.That is not a coherent argument. A coherent argument is an explanation of why the event applies or does not apply. There have been a couple of us on her that have tried to explain to you. What you use as a definition no longer apply. The meaning of the words are an out dated notion. A coherent argument would be to explain why they are not.
This is how you concede defeat. You aren't capable to admit it so you change the argument, deflecting. How is that analogy of your 'writers intent' that you are probably unaware of. See, I can be clairvoyant too.
I guess you are ahead of the curve on Webster. The meanings of the words have added meaning without the disregard of ther previous meanings.
It is obviously you aren't capable of comprehending what is posted. If you refer back to the definitions I posted of the words 'bastard and prostitute' you would see that they, not only took on additional meaning but still retain their original meanings. If you claim what you just posted is correct, what do you call a child born out of wedlock in 2018? Is there a new word or is it still called a bastard. Just because the children born out of marriage is more accepting, a child born from an unmarried couple is still a bastard
Quote:So when she says that line and lays on top of him, and the camera pans away, she was going to preform some magic? Is that what the "writers intent" was about that whole scene? I been watching GoT. Du you think if Grimm was produced in the same manner as GoT and the camera did not pan away, you really think she was going to preform magic? Maybe where you live it is called "Majique" (the cat or as referred to a baby cat) no pun intended. Where I come from it is called Found Under Carnal Knowledge -ING
When Nick comes back to the house and sees his bed unmade it wasn't due to some magic Juliette preformed, it was scrunched up due to plain old unadulterated SEX. Yes, it was literally SEX. But I have to tip off my hat for your clairvoyant ability to be able to read minds of the actors Clair,Bitsie, or Breee. You are just an amazing "legend in your own mind". (just in case you miss-interpeted tha last sentence, it is SARCASM) This is a fantasy TV show, not a subject for someone to study for their thesis for a PHD or Doctorate. Are you capable to comprehend MY "writers intent"?
You have a hang up about sex. I never said they did not have sex. I said that is not what their value is. Neither Adalind or Juliette was ever soon to be required to have sex. In all cases it was the female that initiated having sex. In all cases it was shown the females where having sex for the pure enjoyment of having sex. It was not as payment, or because it was expected. It is not about being clairvoyant, it is about listening to the actress opinion on how the characters are portrayed. You keep wanting to frame it as if the female characters are being sexually exploited by the men. I don't know maybe you can't conceive that women like and have sex no different then men. Gone are the days when women feel it is something men expect them to do. Now days women are the aggressors. Women are the ones to buy you a drink, and ask you to go home with them. And before you go there that does not make them immoral, lose, or any other derogatory word you want to use because in your mind it fits some definition. Like someone else said it is the 21st century get with the program. It is a new day for women.
The other thing that points out the writers where not using sex to gain leverage. Not one time was there sex with or for something gained. Even Adalind, she used it as a delivery method, but it was not the sex that was the tool.
Gee-sus, man you have no clue on WTF you are talking about. When did the female cast became the writers and directors or the creative team?. Is this more of your confusion of claiming to know "writers intent" and then denying it. Is it your ability to be clairvoyant then denying you are?. Are you confusing what the female cast welcomed how their parts were written as opposed for them writing their scenes? I can not keep up with your confusions. Were you ever diagnosed with ADHD (Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder)
You must be a real legend in your own mind to be able to claim that women are finally coming into their own by enjoying sex just like men these days. I guess, according to you, in the past women hated sex. According to you, say 50 years ago, women that cheated on men, did not initiate sex and did not seek pleasure in it. Pal, you have lots to learn about women today and in the past.
Did it ever occur to you that I apply the same puritanical principles to men as I do to women? Are you practicing "selective clairvoyance"? When I made my list of the worse offenders (sluts) in sex partners indulgences on the show, I do believe I listed Sean on the top. Last time I looked, he was a male.
According to you, I have a hang up about sex because I believe Juliette was being a harlot for initiating sex just for pleasure and not for cheating, revenge and whatever else you seem to know more about me than I do. According to you, I see no issues with men enjoying sex with multiple partners but frown upon women enjoying the same? Must be that clairvoyance creeping out again.
Hey, I am Italian, for me, when having sex, one of my main objective is to make sure the woman has pleasure too, kinda guarantees 'repeat customer, for me, the same customer, capisce?
I guess, according to your great insight after I am done watching Games of Thrones, I will be blowing my brains out. ROFLMAO
You know you are OLD, when you see the Slide Ruler you used in college selling in an ANTIQUE SHOP!!