04-15-2018, 07:13 PM
(04-15-2018, 06:15 PM)syscrash Wrote:Quote:My morality has nothing to do with word definition. I classified her with a word by it's definition. I then showed proof of her behavior which was presented on the screen, not on deleted scenes nor from my imagination to reinforce my definition of that labeling.Because society had certain expectations for how they felt women should conduct themselves. words where created to describe the women that did not meet these expectations. As people became more enlightened these terms went from being a definition to being a slur. That the word slut meets the legal definition does not change the fact that it is a slur. The other problem with your argument is the definition is suggestive. what is considered many sexual partners to one is not the same to someone else. To one person anything above one is to many. With others one a week is a dry spell. It is ones opinion that sets the limit. That opinion is based on some moral expectation.
Here is the other thing that is total opinion on your part. You assume Juliette dating habits included having sex. You just assume that her grandmother warning about boys in the back seat meant she was having sex. Even now I have kids, they date, go away for the weekends. Even sleep together but their actions do not include having sex.
So not only is the word you are using now considered a slur. The definition is not accurate for what Juliette was doing. Plus the definition is antiquated based on today's norms for what is a healthy sexual appetite.
Quote:Today, here in the US, thanks to the changes in "MORALITY" we have more children born out of wedlock than we did, lets say 50 or 60 years ago. Does that change the definition of a "Bastard Child"? Most learned one! Does it? Does the word bastard has another meaning? I know we use it to put down others but its still used to tell someone that they were born out of wedlock even if not so, because it is still derogatory.this entire paragraph is based on your opinion on what is moral. Statistic show children of single mothers do not do any worse the children of married couples. We know this is true because marriage is down but the population is still increasing yet the overall standards of society is increasing. The cultural and intellectual levels are increasing. The acceptance of diversity is increasing. Even you state the word bastard is derogatory. Yet you want to argue it is the appropriate label of a child born out of wedlock because to you that is a negative thing. Even though you can not sight any negative effects other then some moral condensation.
Your arguments may fit the definition of the words you use. But you arguments are bereft of any intellectual understanding of the subject. All your arguments see relationships as having a certain structure. Anything out side that is a negative. I would summarize you would have a problem or at least find a child raised in a same sex relationship as not being an optimal situation. Even though statistics would say the opposite.
It is easy to tell your position is not sustainable, because you can not even make a coherent argument in support of your position. You always revert back to standard talking points. This entire discussion is you basing your position on the definition of a word, yet you can not provide support for the accuracy of the definition. I disproved the negativity of your argument with a simple observation. Is society better or worse then before. do women have more opportunities and less restrictions. Do minorities have more opportunities and less restrictions. Since they do, how can you argue what you see as a negative is having an adverse effect. Even if you argue the negatives we see in the news. Statistics show these events are down.
You just confirmed it. You do believe your own BS. I tried but you are a lost cause. Enjoy your delusion of grandeur like a pig in shitz, enjoy.
You know you are OLD, when you see the Slide Ruler you used in college selling in an ANTIQUE SHOP!!