04-10-2018, 04:57 AM
(This post was last modified: 04-10-2018, 04:57 AM by dicappatore.)
(04-10-2018, 12:24 AM)syscrash Wrote: There is an difference between implicit and explicate. the argument seems to be if the conversation deviates from what is implicitly shown then comments are to be considered fan fiction. There are a lot of us that realize. The ambiguity injected by the writers is not by accident but a form of creative expression. It is the same thing that what you envision when you read a book seldom lives up to what is shown when they make a book into a movie. I never expected for those who only see the show on a simplistic level, to every understand where I was going with how I see clues of another level of the story the writers was trying to tell.
Instead of focusing on the underlying concept I was pointing out. So many of the comments focus on disproving the clues. Remember this is none of these writers first rodeo. If you ever watched the post reviews the writers did on previous shows. They explain the deeper view, intent, and visions they had when writing those shows. Take Buffy, if you watched the cast interview they did years after the show. David explain the inspiration, what he was trying to show. He even explained the intent behind Buffy and Angle and why he changed to Buffy and spike.
None of which was explicitly shown or explained in the show. None of which was explained while the show was in production. I imagine the same will happen with Grimm. Like Buffy 10 years from now D & G will pull back the curtain and divulge all the little secrets as to what was on their minds. Right now there is an image of the show and characters that they want to promote. It is what they feel will make it sell.
So are the clues I pointed out true, are they as G&K meant them to be seen. It will be years before we actually know. The one thing we do know based on their other work, their intent is more then what we see. Based on Buffy I realize they write two shows. One is what you see. They one comments argue that the dialog supports. The other it a lot deeper and only some get. this is the show many comments try and disprove. It is an individual that must decide which viewer are you.
FYI to see what some of the intent on Buffy was. Watch the Buffy reunion interview that is on you tube. They all dish on motivations, intent, and things they did just for shock value.
All I can say is, you make a better argument against yourself than I do. How is my analysis on "writers intent" on what you just posted?
You know you are OLD, when you see the Slide Ruler you used in college selling in an ANTIQUE SHOP!!