11-01-2018, 10:40 AM
(This post was last modified: 11-01-2018, 10:41 AM by dicappatore.)
(11-01-2018, 09:31 AM)Hell Rell Wrote: I'm going to talk about what the audience knew and nothing more. Adalind hired the assassin and Juliette lured Kelly back to Portland. It's just a difference of opinion on to which degree we hold them responsible.
Adalind, along with Renard, hired the assassin after failing to kill Marie herself. some posters think what she did was worse and hold her more responsible.
On the other hand, Juliette knowing Kelly would be murdered for certain is never confirmed so some posters see her as not being held accountable for Kelly's death.
Now, I'll just speak for myself. Juliette is just as responsible for Kelly's death as Adalind is for Marie's even though she was never in the room or hired someone to kill Marie herself. I'll try my best to explain why:
Adalind is responsible for Marie's death but she was just a cog. Marie was going to have people coming to that hospital to kill her regardless of Adalind. Renard would'be made sure of it. He's the main reason Marie was targeted for death and he really didn't need to rely on Adalind.
Juliette may have been a cog as well whom can claim ignorance and wasn't the one driving the bus but she is the primary reason Kelly, along with the neighbors, were killed by Kenneth and co. Kelly wouldn't have been found and lured back to Portland, let alone brutally murdered, if it weren't for Juliette. It wasn't even like she was threatened to do these things. She willingly lured Kelly back and gave out information about her neighbors. Juliette also knew an ambush was about to take place. She is largely responsible for everything that happened afterwards. The neighbors wouldn't have been killed if Kelly were not lured back to town. None of this could've happened without Juliette doing this of her own free will.
I'm not a juror so I'm not talking about how things would go down in a court of law. If that were tbe case, plenty of the criminals on this show would've walked free.
The point I am trying to make to this Mr. Legal Scholar, Mr. writers intent and the wacka-doodle they don't seem to get. Adalind did not lure Marie to Portland. Adalind did attempt.
Juliette was all-in the organization that committed the crime. She might not know what the outcome was going to be but she knew exactly what she was doing when she sent the email, left the door open and told Kelly it was safe to come. She was on the planning Committee. Adalind did not make the plans for Marie to be in a Portland hospital.
I might not convince these warped minds. But the majority doesn't buy that version. They are in the minority, which reflects what would happen on a jury trial and the same opinion would be in the minority. Juliette would be found guilty, at best, a hung jury.
I never claimed Adalind would get away with what she did. The problem is when they make the veracity of what Juliette did was less than what Adalind did.
(11-01-2018, 10:27 AM)FaceInTheCrowd Wrote:(11-01-2018, 10:07 AM)N_grimm Wrote: Juliette would need a good lawyer if she where to convince the court that she did not expect Kelly to be killed.
Not how it works. Prosecution has to prove that she did. Google "burden of proof."
So, now we are back to What we saw does not count? Again?
You know you are OLD, when you see the Slide Ruler you used in college selling in an ANTIQUE SHOP!!