10-07-2018, 03:31 AM
(This post was last modified: 10-07-2018, 03:50 AM by dicappatore.)
(10-06-2018, 07:53 AM)irukandji Wrote:(10-06-2018, 12:55 AM)dicappatore Wrote: WHAT? cloaking my ass? I think I was pretty clear whom I was aiming my comments to. There is no ambiguity in it. I think it was kind of creative on the sarcasm I used but, alas, you are too wrapped around yourself thinking I was trying to hide. lol
Just to be clear. My comment was to the both of you about the facts that the time line eric wrote about was off than more than a few weeks and what made it more poignant was in my ability "to kill two birds with one stone". Then I used rp's analogy of using Adalind's pregnancy too prove my point, Capisce? How ironic, killing a bird while it is eating crow. Cannibalism, yuk.
Like I said, I have been wondering at the lack of novelty on your part. I mean, come on, the best you could do was to give Monroe a last name based on a platter. Pretty lame.
You really haven't come up with anything or shown intelligent thought provoking contributions for a while now. THAT's why you've resorted to regale everyone with yet another boring commentary starring yourself as the expert on your opinion. In reality, it's just an excuse to huff and puff and once again prove that the best you can do is rage at me, or anyone that has a contrary opinion to you.
So please go on. You've really bordered on pathetic these days. You're reduced to raging on about a thank you. A thank you that wasn't addressed to you!
P.S. Please remember there are a number of spelling helpfuls out on the internet. You'd do well to use them. Friendly reminder.
1st off, English was never my forte, being foreign born didn't help. I can appreciate if you could point out my spelling errors. BTW, where I was born, Spelling was a non subject. Early on I had an issue with words such as "two", "too" and "to". These days I got to distinguish "two" easily but when I type I might still confuse "too" and "to".
My other issues are about "phrasing". For an example. Growing op I had to learn "The Lords Prayer". Back then it was called "Our Father". As I learned it, it was called "Padre Nostro". The literal translation of that prayer is "Father Ours" instead of "Our Father". See? the phrasing is reversed. That is why, I never found Yoda talking style to be much out of the ordinary.
Now I can easily go back and check up on all these red underlined words like the one you wrote, in the sentence:
"P.S. Please remember there are a number of spelling helpfuls out on the internet.".
The word "helpfuls" shows up as red underlined. Is that one of your miss-spelled words? So does the word "THAT's" shows up red-underlined.
Another issue I might have, again with phrasing is the sentence I wrote above,
"Now I can easily go back and check up on all these red underlined words like the one you wrote, in the sentence"
Or should I have written it as:
"Now I can easily go back and check up on all these red underlined words, in the sentence you wrote".
See my dilemma?
Now as for your comment on:
Quote:Like I said, I have been wondering at the lack of novelty on your part. I mean, come on, the best you could do was to give Monroe a last name based on a platter. Pretty lame.
You pointed out, it was lame. Thats your opinion. Can you point out what part of the facts I used to make my argument bogus? Was the plate with the name on it, created in my own mind? Or did you also see it on the screen?
Can you point out what facts I created, from the show, to make my argument believable? You and others can disagree all to your hearts content with my opinion but you can not claim the evidence I used from the show was created by me. Can you? I dare you to try.
Are you even capable to understand the differences between what took place on the screen and what takes place in your delusional mind? Was My argument based on an actual scene and scripted dialogue or did I pull it out of my ass? Again, not my opinion but the facts I used to make an opinion.
Now on your other remarks you missed the boat on.
Quote:You really haven't come up with anything or shown intelligent thought provoking contributions for a while now. THAT's why you've resorted to regale everyone with yet another boring commentary starring yourself as the expert on your opinion.
Don't you think by now, over a year after the show's ending, We have beaten every dead horse, on this forum, to death? Are you capable to understand the show has ended? Like I said it on other threads. There is a section on this forum called "Fan Creations" where you can run wild on your interpretation of the show instead of your LAME attempts, on these threads, to change the show's narrative to your wishfulls outcomes.
As for your other comment:
Quote:In reality, it's just an excuse to huff and puff and once again prove that the best you can do is rage at me, or anyone that has a contrary opinion to you.And why not? This is much more entertaining "TO ME", unlike as you, trying to rehashing old arguments with more of your creative delusional delusions.
(10-06-2018, 06:36 PM)eric Wrote: Dicappatore, I am still curious, how long do you think it was between the mirror and the cross bow? More or less? We only saw Juliette spent one night in her car. Juliette seemed frantic to get back to normal, no time to waste there. No one stays in jail very long after a bar fight, at least in Louisiana. "Jack" Renard seemed to kill at a fast pace. Kenneth did not waste time getting Diana--"What does he like? Results". Shoot, the time lapse between Kelly losing her head and the king flying was a matter of a few hours.
IMO and using rp's pregnancy analogy, that time span was well over a month or two. If that is your interpretation of a few weeks, so be it. Sorry to get you caught up and involved with certain contributors with my pursuit for "Truth, justice and the American way".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3GflKh9jlCg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLO4Qnv1IS8
You know you are OLD, when you see the Slide Ruler you used in college selling in an ANTIQUE SHOP!!