(07-31-2018, 02:37 PM)syscrash Wrote: In Grimm how many pages where used to debate how Adalind took Nicks powers. Most were based on personal beliefs. That I can understand. It is when they consider those that see it another way are wrong. That is not to say the those of a different view are right.
I can think of two more situations where posters' personal beliefs were adamant. There were no fake statements about basing opinions on the characters' actions as presented on the screen.
One is the ongoing debate whether Juliette was controlled by the hexenbiest or not. Most have argued that Juliette freely accepted the hexenbiest and all decisions were her own. Yet, we have Adalind's statement to Rosalee which seems to contradict that argument:
"You don't understand what it's like being a Hexenbiest-what it does to you, the way it makes you think and feel. It's not good."
The other ongoing debate is whether or not Juliette knew Kelly was going to be murdered. Most argue that Juliette knew. Yet, we have Juliette's statement to Nick:
"I didn't know Kenneth was going to do that".
If objective statements were being made rather than personal views, there wouldn't be pages and pages of debate in this forum. Personally, I prefer the debate. That's much more interesting rather than reading something that's fake and utterly laughable, not to mention hypocritical.
The best way to frustrate a cyberbully is to ignore him.