(07-27-2018, 02:51 PM)Hell Rell Wrote:(07-27-2018, 11:47 AM)irukandji Wrote: Catherine was a Hexenbiest. Renard is a Zauberbiest. It's not incorrect to state Catherine, the Hexenbiest, was indebted to Renard, the Zauberbiest, anymore than calling Nick a Grimm. I'm not sure what you're getting at here, but it seems you're splitting hairs.
It's not splitting hairs at all. The way you phrased it matters. You made it seem like Catherine was indebted to Renard because he was a Zauberbiest and that gave him some type of authority over Catherine, the Hexenbiest.
It's completely splitting hairs. I said had never heard of a hexenbiest being indebted to a zauerbiest before. There was a debt, it was mentioned in the script. As to what kind of a debt, we don't know. So in fact, Catherine, the hexenbiest, was indebted to Renard, the zauerbiest. I didn't make it sound like anything other than a debt. It was you who chose to make more out of the post by stating Renard had some kind of authority over Catherine.
(07-27-2018, 02:51 PM)Hell Rell Wrote: He brought up Zerstorer to highlight just how powerful Conrad was in comparison. He was saying Zerstorer was the only being other than Diana shown to be more powerful than Conrad without a doubt.
I know what he was saying. You just brought up that this was a discussion about full zauerbiests. Zerstorer is not a hexenbiest, so the point whether he's more powerful than Conrad really doesn't have a basis in this thread, does it?
The best way to frustrate a cyberbully is to ignore him.