03-12-2018, 11:55 AM
(This post was last modified: 03-12-2018, 12:04 PM by dicappatore.)
(03-12-2018, 11:55 AM)dicappatore Wrote: [quote='syscrash' pid='69547' dateline='1520854695']
There is a problem with your assumptions. for one the show stated the property that the trailer was on was in Juliette name. For Nick to charge her with arson he would have to prove the trailer was his and he was renting the land from her. The problem with filling an arson claim is someone would have to investigate the trailer which would expose wesen secrets. The wesen catch twenty two.
The wesen council would not have a problem with dropping the statue on Adlind because no one would suspect it was caused by Juliette or any other wesen. They also do not have a problem with wesen killing other wesen no matter the reason.
The bar fight. The only problem the council might have is that she woged. But the guy was the only one who saw her. But then there are a number of episode where wesen used their woged to intimidate someone. which goes to the theory that woging is handled on a case by case bases. As for why she was arrested. When ever there is a confrontation it is asked who wants to press charges. She was in jail so we know he pressed charges. We don't know if she also pressed charges. As for damages, that makes no sense because if asked how she borke the lights no one would have an answer.
You can't just use your feelings about a character. to try an justify how the law would apply. As for what happened to Kelly. You may feel she is guilty. But if you watch the show you will see the writers left room for plausible denial. You may feel that someone has an obligation to report a crime. but actually you are not legally required to report. If asked if you have knowledge of a crime you are then obligated to tell what you know. There is also the excuse of Juliette having a fear of retribution.
Emotionally you may have a point but not legally either by wesen law or kersite law. If you watch you will see the writers made sure there was a way out for juliette. If for no onther reason they intended to have her work with the group.
I have pointed out, on many occasions of some contributors of claiming their opinions as facts. but you are just making up facts that are not even debatable. What drugs are you on? Where you high when you were watching the show? I will just point out on one of your statements.
Quote: for one the show stated the property that the trailer was on was in Juliette name
Now, it is possible, Nick bought the and and put it under Juliette's name. Can you reference a scene or dialogue where it tells us Juliette owned the land? I can reference Nick claiming he bought the land when he moved the trailer from the storage yard, can you point out when its claimed it was owned by Juliette?
I will give you the benefit of the doubt and lets say, to hide ownership, he did put the land under her name and i forgot the scene when it was stated. Owning the land and even the trailer and putting the trailer on fire is still arson and unlawful. I don't know where you live, obviously, you are unfamiliar with your fire codes.
You know you are OLD, when you see the Slide Ruler you used in college selling in an ANTIQUE SHOP!!