(03-12-2018, 04:38 AM)syscrash Wrote: There is a problem with your assumptions. for one the show stated the property that the trailer was on was in Juliette name. For Nick to charge her with arson he would have to prove the trailer was his and he was renting the land from her. The problem with filling an arson claim is someone would have to investigate the trailer which would expose wesen secrets. The wesen catch twenty two.Syscrsh,
The wesen council would not have a problem with dropping the statue on Adlind because no one would suspect it was caused by Juliette or any other wesen. They also do not have a problem with wesen killing other wesen no matter the reason.
The bar fight. The only problem the council might have is that she woged. But the guy was the only one who saw her. But then there are a number of episode where wesen used their woged to intimidate someone. which goes to the theory that woging is handled on a case by case bases. As for why she was arrested. When ever there is a confrontation it is asked who wants to press charges. She was in jail so we know he pressed charges. We don't know if she also pressed charges. As for damages, that makes no sense because if asked how she borke the lights no one would have an answer.
You can't just use your feelings about a character. to try an justify how the law would apply. As for what happened to Kelly. You may feel she is guilty. But if you watch the show you will see the writers left room for plausible denial. You may feel that someone has an obligation to report a crime. but actually you are not legally required to report. If asked if you have knowledge of a crime you are then obligated to tell what you know. There is also the excuse of Juliette having a fear of retribution.
Emotionally you may have a point but not legally either by wesen law or kersite law. If you watch you will see the writers made sure there was a way out for juliette. If for no onther reason they intended to have her work with the group.
I disagree with all of your statements. The show is fantasy, however it does provide some facts. For example your first statement relies upon:
Quote:the show stated the property that the trailer was on was in Juliette nameWhere did you get that information? It seems contrary to:
http://grimm.wikia.com/wiki/Blond_Ambition
Quote:Later, Nick and Trubel drive away from Forest Hills Storage with the trailer hooked up. Nick says too many people know where the trailer is, so he bought a piece of land. In the middle of a forest, Nick unhitches the trailer, and he and Trubel put some things from Nick's car into the trailer.http://grimm.wikia.com/wiki/Blond_Ambition/Transcript
Quote:Scene: Nick and Trubel move the trailer.As for Wesen Laws the Council enforced, you should review:
Trubel: Why do we have to move it now?
Nick: Too many people seem to know where it is, and we got this new stuff. It seems like a good time to find it a new home. I bought a piece of land. It's gonna be a lot harder for people to figure out where it is.
http://grimm.wikia.com/wiki/Wesen_Council
Quote:The Wesen Council of Wallenstadt was a group of Wesen that governed Wesen law. The most severe law they enforced was the Gesetzbuch Ehrenkodex, also known as the Code of Swabia, which is the most important law of honor Wesen have. Part of the law in the Council said it was forbidden to use their Wesen side to disadvantage or murder Kehrseite, which was a capital crime.I have provided the factual evidence upon which my statements rely. Do you have any such evidence to support yours? Could it be you are only presenting an opinion that is contrary to an factual evidence?
N G