02-04-2018, 02:36 AM
(This post was last modified: 02-04-2018, 02:50 AM by Henry of green.)
(02-04-2018, 02:13 AM)silver Wrote:(02-04-2018, 01:22 AM)Henry of green Wrote:(02-04-2018, 12:10 AM)silver Wrote: Even though their actions varied widely, it still adds up to both did equally heinous stuff.
You don't have to be 'evil' as such, to do what they think is best for the kids.
It's simply the nature of both 'biests'.
Intelligent comment that I mostly agree with they were both equally heinous in their behaviour however the innocent neighbors deaths that Juliette helped arrange in my opinion makes Juliettes actual crimes more heinous.
Well, you have a point -- She may have had no idea about what would befall the neighbors -- unless there was detailed exchange of info between her and Kenneth / Rispoli. That was an indirect occurrence due to her assist in the 'project'.
I continue to think they're equally unruffled over the deaths of anybody....when they are hexenbiests.
Silva, it’s not as simple as that, Adalind was at her most heinous when she was human in late season 1 and season 2 , she put innocent Juliette in a comma and tried to sell her child while human and helped set up Frau pech’s death. She was a hexenbiest in season 5 and 6 yet she was at her most compassionate saving Juliette from the tunnel, helping the gang defeat Renard and BC and trying to stop Diania from being so murderous. Hexenbiest Adalind had tears in her eyes when she heard about Wu and Hanks death in 5x13, season 2 human Adalind had the Verat beat up and hospitalise poor Hank barely a year after trying to kill him yet she didn’t give a toss.