01-28-2018, 06:22 AM
Obviously Henry and decapitator you don't understand having an intellectual discussion. For one an intellectual discussion you from a theory and then provide facts that support that theory. In this type of discussion opinion and beliefs do not work. he is an example.
You also have a problem with the statement because nothing proves that she had to sleep with Nick to take his powers. We have no logical reason for the writers to use that method. From a story stand point It drives the story arc of the eventual breakup and Juliette's animosity towards Adalind.
As for the rest of your paragraph you are arguing a point. I was describing a concept. To say hexenbiest are conniving does not mean that to be conniving makes you a hexenbiest. The same with your argument about Adadlind not being confrontational. I was showing how she was different. Pointing out the reason does not change the how. Comparing her to others also does not change the how she is different.
Also you keep mixing what she is with who she is. Think of it this way. the what she is determines how she does something. why she does something is based on who she is.
example helping others is a sign of who you are. Being a programmer and solving problems logically is because of what you are. Even though solving problems logically does not make you a programmer.
Quote:Adalind took Nicks powers beacuse she wanted Diania back plain and simple,There is a problem with that statement. Yes victor told her take Nick powers and she could see Diana. Problem is Victor did not have Diana. Even though the character thought he did. It becomes a false statement to argue in the definitive when we know it is a misleading fact.
You also have a problem with the statement because nothing proves that she had to sleep with Nick to take his powers. We have no logical reason for the writers to use that method. From a story stand point It drives the story arc of the eventual breakup and Juliette's animosity towards Adalind.
As for the rest of your paragraph you are arguing a point. I was describing a concept. To say hexenbiest are conniving does not mean that to be conniving makes you a hexenbiest. The same with your argument about Adadlind not being confrontational. I was showing how she was different. Pointing out the reason does not change the how. Comparing her to others also does not change the how she is different.
Also you keep mixing what she is with who she is. Think of it this way. the what she is determines how she does something. why she does something is based on who she is.
example helping others is a sign of who you are. Being a programmer and solving problems logically is because of what you are. Even though solving problems logically does not make you a programmer.
Embrace your inner Biest..... We all have one