Quote:No they didn’t say it was possible the interviewer asked if it’s fair to assume they were still together and they said yes that’s fair there was no possible about it you just refused to accept it.saying it is a fair assumption does not make it a fact. a fair assumption is the definition of being possible. Being possible does not mean it is. The bottom line if it was definitive G&K would have said it was a fact they are together. Just like they did for Monroe and Rosalee. The way it was stated if you want to believe they are together that is fair. If you want to believe they are not together that is also fair. It is the definition of ambiguous.
What i see as you seeing a contradiction in my statement is you don't delineate between my comments on things the writers leave as ambiguous compared to the things they provide narrative to support they position. Example The contract. Everything about the contract the writers made ambiguous. they said noting about what it was for, what are the consequences. They have never stated any ramifications or out comes from the contract. Even so I have made speculations that the contract is what created Diana, it is also what made the return of zestora possible. I have also said that is my opinion because the writers never gave us direction.
Another point that was ambiguous was when Juliette seduced Sean. For one we do not know what they did. The writers did not give us a clue. Unlike with Sean and Adalind they added a comment where she thanked him for the night before. We also do not know why that scene was added. My assumption which is strictly my opinion. The writers wanted to show Juliette start to think more like a hexenbiest. They had already used Adalind actions to show that hexenbiest are very sexual. But then again it may have been added for it's provocative nature.
Embrace your inner Biest..... We all have one