10-22-2017, 01:48 AM
(This post was last modified: 10-22-2017, 01:53 AM by dicappatore.)
S4, E2, Octopus Head, toward the end of this episode. Here is another “LITTLE FACT” some tend to forget. After Nick’s Grimm was taken away and Adalind takes off to Vienna to report to the Royals and confirm, she had taken the Grimm from Nick. Adalind ends up in a Hex-proof dungeon.
At the same time, back in Portland, Wu s at Nick’s house asking about Trubel, supposedly a criminology student living with him and Juliette is the same person wanted for a possible double suicide.
As Wu asks Nick about her, he drops to the floor and can only see, what Adalind is seeing, in the dungeon she is in. There is a connection between these two characters that never existed or will exist between Nick and Juliette.
There will be a connection between Diana, Adalind and Juliette later on, but never between Nick and Juliette except when the go to the hotel in S6, E7, Blind Love, but that’s because of an effected drink from the disgruntle waiter. And even then it was just one way, not reciprocal.
But like you stated Henry, does it matter how Adailnd told her? The fact is, Adalind told Diana, it was Bonaparte. That info got to Diana by Adalind.
At the same time, back in Portland, Wu s at Nick’s house asking about Trubel, supposedly a criminology student living with him and Juliette is the same person wanted for a possible double suicide.
As Wu asks Nick about her, he drops to the floor and can only see, what Adalind is seeing, in the dungeon she is in. There is a connection between these two characters that never existed or will exist between Nick and Juliette.
There will be a connection between Diana, Adalind and Juliette later on, but never between Nick and Juliette except when the go to the hotel in S6, E7, Blind Love, but that’s because of an effected drink from the disgruntle waiter. And even then it was just one way, not reciprocal.
(10-22-2017, 01:47 AM)Henry of green Wrote:(10-22-2017, 01:25 AM)dicappatore Wrote:(10-21-2017, 09:53 AM)Henry of green Wrote:(10-21-2017, 09:48 AM)irukandji Wrote:I'm not saying that I'm saying when Adalind told her it was one of daddy's freinds(10-21-2017, 09:42 AM)Henry of green Wrote: It was probably the way Adalind had told her it was one of daddy friends not so subtle hint.
Adalind wouldn't have done that. She didn't want to take Sean down.
it give her the hint it was Boneparte that had bruised her neck.
Here is a great example when one’s convoluted idiotic opinion becomes a fact and a fact becomes non-existence.
How can someone state that Adalind wouldn’t have done that, when she did? Why else did Diana go after Bonaparte unless Adalind told her. Does it matter if she told her directly or in-directly? Why is this even an argument. WTF where they watching to even create this ridiculous contradiction?
Diana killed Bonaparte using Sean because Bonaparte tried to choke her mom. This is what happened! THE END!
I think maybe in the back of her mind Adalind was hopping Diania would have the power to take out Boneparte but didn't directly tell her to beacuse she's a good mother .
But like you stated Henry, does it matter how Adailnd told her? The fact is, Adalind told Diana, it was Bonaparte. That info got to Diana by Adalind.
You know you are OLD, when you see the Slide Ruler you used in college selling in an ANTIQUE SHOP!!