06-18-2017, 03:39 PM
(06-18-2017, 11:16 AM)irukandji Wrote: Not confused in the least New Guy. What I see here is the general male perception of what constitutes a whore. In my opinion, it's not accurate in my view as a female and is not consistent with the definitions provided.The definitions are not mine, nor are they a "male perception."
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/whore
Quote:a person who is sexually promiscuous.
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/promiscuous
Quote:having sexual relations with a number of partners on a casual basis.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fornication
Quote:consensual sexual intercourse between two persons not married to each other
Fact: Juliette had consensual sexual intercourse but was not married
Fact: Juliette had sexual relations with a number of partners on a casual basis.
Fact: Juliette was a person who was sexually promiscuous.
Iruk, these are irrefutable facts and based on the definitions Juliette was a whore. Adalind also meets all three definitions.
If you wish to prove me incorrect, you will need to prove that she did not fornicate Renard, Kenneth and Nick. If Nick was her only sexual partner, she would not meet the definition. Lacking that, your opinion seems indefensible and Juliette is a whore.
N G