02-12-2017, 07:00 PM
Now that's a disqualifier, imo. If we could foresee all the future there would be no need to make decisions. Plus it may have been that the assassination of Kelly's husband and dear friend was necessary in order that she go on the run and give over her son for her sister to raise. Thereby assuring his safety so that he could be at the time and place to fulfill the prophecy we talk about on this forum. I could construct a similar argument about her answering Juliette's urgent request that she come and rescue her son - thereby rushing to her own date with death and setting off a chain of events that placed Diana at the same time and place as Nick and the others to keep an appointment with destiny.
"The only thing that will redeem mankind is cooperation." Bertrand Russell - printed on a beer mat in "Shaun of The Dead".