02-11-2017, 02:37 PM
(02-11-2017, 01:37 PM)rpmaluki Wrote: I have said before that this show is very blunt about characters and their motives for the things they do. There's no nuance no depth/layers. What you see is what you get. They've never had the viewers look left when a character's gone right. Sean openly plotted against Nick/ordered the deaths of his aunt and partner. Adalind fully complied. Renard did a 180 (which people have easily believed and are waiting for him to become a card carrying full member of the scoobies in a few epusode) but they won't accept that Adalind has changed for the better due to being a mother (after Diana's birth).
That sums it up rather well.
(02-11-2017, 02:04 PM)syscrash Wrote: Adalind did exactly what Eve said she would do. Adalind took off with Kelly. Adalind was with Nick for protection. So why not let him protect her…
Nick is just clueless When considering the situation. Nick has done that on many occasions…
…Adalind on the other hand is a thief in the night. The same as Sean. he does his dirt behind your back. Take the trust me knot. He goes behind their back to double cross them.
Nick is clueless when failing to recognize something is going on with Juliette? But when Adalind tells Nick Renard will use Diana to coerce her, and Eve warns him pointblank something is happening with Adalind, Nick not’s clueless, Adalind is just being bad Adalind?
syscrash, you seem to be using the same argument to exonerate Juliette and condemn Adalind. And for some reason find it impossible that a former villain can possibly change for the better or that a former good girl could possibly be at fault when she bad. This is pretty much the epitome of double standards.
"If my devils are to leave me, I am afraid my angels will take flight as well." Rainer Maria Rilke