02-08-2017, 06:48 AM
(This post was last modified: 02-08-2017, 06:51 AM by Grimmbiest11.)
(02-08-2017, 05:40 AM)MarylikesGrimm Wrote:I was referring to the part where other poster feel Adalind does not take enough risk for Nick. The next best thing will be fore her to die for Nick to qualify as taking risk for Nick and prove her love along the way(02-08-2017, 03:56 AM)Grimmbiest11 Wrote:(02-07-2017, 03:32 PM)MarylikesGrimm Wrote:(02-07-2017, 03:23 PM)irukandji Wrote:(02-07-2017, 03:18 PM)MarylikesGrimm Wrote: Sean was only trying to save money and Nick was trying save his life and others.
It doesn't make Nick any better than Sean, Mary. It only makes him self-centered.
IMO saving friends of both Nick and Adalind is not self-centered. Other posters say that Adalind does not take enough risk for Nick.
So I guess Adalind has to die for Nick to qualify
Sorry, I do not understand. I thought we were talking about Adalind lying in court so Sean would not kill Nick and the scooby team.
(02-07-2017, 05:21 PM)izzy Wrote:Wow this is really harsh and sexist and sooo unnecessary. So a woman can't be sexually emancipated without being called a whore. Being sexually liberal qualifies one as a whore. Good to know.(02-07-2017, 03:05 PM)MarylikesGrimm Wrote: Let me understand you, in your eyes Adalind is a tramp
Yes!!!
Quote:so that justifies Sean and/or Nick mistreating her
No, and I have no idea why you would think that. Generally a man who lays with a whore is a whore-monger and debases himself by his actions. It takes two to tangle and no where will you find a statement from me, taken in context, that indicates it is morally acceptable to engage in frivolous sexual relations.
Kindest regards,
Izod
P.S.
You might recall, when you first sported it, I indicated I was a fan of your signature line.