(11-28-2018, 04:06 PM)irukandji Wrote: This is your quote:
Quote:And the fact that the others had to die for Nick to find his strength have been highlighted by the writers many times.
You place a great deal of importance on this, even to the point of stating the writers agreed with your explanation.
I assume that if the writers highlighted it many times, they'd put it in the script. So what did Nick say that led you to this conclusion that he found inner strength as the result of his friends' death?
All I am reading from you is a lot of fluff with no proof. There are some here who throw out canon like it's a hot potato, yet no one has come forth to show where canon supports Nick making such a statement.
There was a lot off stuff the writers didn’t include, because they only had 43 minutes available. The reason I’m saying the writers are agreeing with me, is because I based my arguments on what they have been saying. Do you expect me to ignore that information?
I will give you a parallel example: In the Harry Potter universe, J.K. Rowling have been giving the fans a lot of addition information that is not in the books. Any material she has written or was involved in or has stated is the highest level of canon in that universe. So why should not the writer’s staments be canon, even if they did not find time to include that in the episode?