01-02-2017, 10:04 AM
(01-02-2017, 09:54 AM)irukandji Wrote:(01-02-2017, 09:12 AM)MarylikesGrimm Wrote:(01-02-2017, 09:06 AM)irukandji Wrote:(01-02-2017, 09:05 AM)MarylikesGrimm Wrote: irukandji
Why do so many fans think sex for a few months is more important than being a parent?
I'm sorry, I don't understand what you mean?
Many fans prioritize "shipping" over becoming a good parent. This thread has a shipping poll but these same fans are not interested in Nick and Adalind becoming better parents.
Why do you think that is so?
Laughs. I get it now. Thank you for clarifying.
Well the primary reason is the obvious one. They don't like the Juliette/Eve character. The biggest fear right now is that Nick is going to take a shine to the 'yet again new Eve', who now has feelings. They want him with Adalind.
I never thought Grimm should have brought babies into the story in the first place. Don't get me wrong, I love kids and while there are movies and series I don't care for them in, there are just as many out there that I love.
But the Grimm writers don't know how to write families. Take Adalind. She never struck me as the motherly type. And while selling one's baby to become a witch again is a pretty appalling thing, I actually could understand that. Grimm is a magical show, and we all know of stories where witches have done not so nice things with children.
But then, they decided for some goofball reason to have Adalind keep her baby. From what I saw, though, the Grimm writers did not know how to write Diana into the series. So we had the Diana fiasco. Now if they'd have just let Adalind sell her baby, all would have been fine.
And still they keep pushing the kids at us. So Adalind has Nick's child. Only now, Adalind seems like the motherly type, but Nick would rather be walking the streets in search of wesen.
In my opinion, since Adalind has shown the desire to be a mother, Grimm should let her be a mother. But not with Nick in the household. I don't see him as a positive influence. Adalind on her own has complete control of the situation and can concentrate on Kelly, and Diana if need be. If Nick wants to stop by and offer support, I'm all for it.
I personally did not care for them living together because I could see it coming. The whole point was to get these two to have sex and develop a strong connection. In my opinion, that was never going to happen because I don't see DG as a versatile enough actor to pull it off.
Oddly enough, I think Renard could. While we might think it's for selfish reasons only, Renard is willing to take Kelly in as his own. I don't see Nick ever accepting Diana as his own.
I for one am hoping that Renard is not the big bad meanie. He and Nick can square off, but I don't want to see him killed.
Thank you for the thought out detailed answer.
Women characters do not have to be having sex with the lead to be important to the story.