(12-11-2016, 11:26 AM)irukandji Wrote:Hi Iruk,(12-10-2016, 04:47 PM)syscrash Wrote: Why is it when people talk about it being right or wrong for Nick hiding Diana with his mom. No one ever considers they where facing death if the royals felt they still had Diana. I have read people saying Nick and the group could protect them.
It was not only wrong but ended up being a huge disaster. Kelly was unfit to protect Diana. She's not reliable and she's not a mother.
Nick, of all people, should have disagreed with her plan from the getgo.
The "plan" began with the extraction of Adalind and her baby from the Royals in Austria. I suppose you can construct a "what if" scenario where Meisner and Kelly didn't get them out. IMO, the royals would have kept the baby and King Freddy would have been in charge of how she was raised. Adalind may have survived if she proved to be an effective hexenpawn of the Royals. Who knows what effect that would have had on the Portland characters.
Regardless, Nick was not aware of the extraction until Kelly, Adalind and a baby showed up on his doorstep with Victor and Royals in hot pursuit.
At what point would you have Nick disagree with Kelly and what is your better alternative?
This thread has wandered off topic, so I'll raise the original question:
Quote:How can Greenwalt & Kouf bring Grimm back on track and provide a satisfactory conclusion in the 13 remaining episodes. It is OK to discuss such issues even though most of season 6 has been filmed it does not begin to air until January 6, 2017.I am seeking ideas within the context of this premise:
Quote:There once was a man who lived a life so strange, it had to be true. Only he could see what no one else can. The darkness inside, the real monster within. And he's the one who must stop them. This is his calling. This is his duty. This is the life of a Grimm.In the remaining 13 episodes, how should Nick as THE Grimm live out his "calling" and fulfill his "duty?"
N G