(12-14-2016, 11:45 AM)MarylikesGrimm Wrote:That makes sense. Why would Adalind turn to the people who stole her last baby. Nick gave her the benefit of the doubt, it was just poorly executed.(12-14-2016, 11:14 AM)irukandji Wrote: [quote='MarylikesGrimm' pid='37904' dateline='1481739152']
Is not about trust, it is about being possible.
Nick knew it was possible he was the father. Juilette believed Nick was the father too. Nick kidnapped the first baby, so he was the last person Adalind wanted as the father of her new baby.
Sorry, about my writing.
(12-14-2016, 11:50 AM)New Guy Wrote:Well she didn't say the baby was 100 % evil, she said “no child of hers is innocent" after saying she'd rip that "little bitch's" throat out. It's the confrontation at the police station in 4x19. Nick had called the baby innocent and solicited that reaction from Juliette. She accused him of choosing Adalind over her.(12-14-2016, 11:15 AM)rpmaluki Wrote: I said that he was either hopeful or delusional because 50% of that baby's genes were his so he didn't see the baby as 100% evil, like Juliette did and actually said so.Hi RPM,
My memory fails me. In what episode did Juliette say the baby is 100% evil?
Thanks,
N G