(09-15-2016, 08:24 AM)jsgrimm45 Wrote:(09-15-2016, 08:21 AM)Hell Rell Wrote: I'm saying that I don't think she ever felt she had the right to burn the trailer. I think revenge was the first and foremost thing in her mind. That's why she called Nick to tell him and made a joke about trying to keep warm because she had no one to hold her any more. Juliette referred to it as "a little payback" when talking to Kenneth.When Trubel and Nick moved the trailer he said he had brought the land under a different name, and the trailer was Kelly's and Marie's so it was his and his only.
I'm having trouble understanding why she can't be charged with destruction of property. Let's say she owned the land. Does that mean someone won't be charged with destruction of property if someone destroyed a car parked on someone else's land? It wasn't there illegally as long as had permission for it to be there which the scoobies would attest to. The contents of the trailer can't be made known but the trailer itself would be cause for concern. There was never any indication that trailer belong to Juliette as far as the courts are concerned.
Thank you! I was using this for the sake of the argument but I never thought the land or the trailer belonged to Juliette. I was just trying to understand how the law would work in this hypothetical scenario since this is what was being discussed.
I also don't think Nick ever considered the trailer belonging to Juliette either. She had access to it but he never considered it belonging to her as much as him. Trubel fit that category more than Juliette. It seems obvious that he would have left it to Trubel in the event of his death and not Juliette.