05-21-2017, 08:11 PM
(05-21-2017, 06:31 PM)Devegs Wrote: I think you wrapped that one nicely. Too bad it's going to go swoosh! Lol.Thanks, and LOL you’re probably right.
(05-21-2017, 06:52 PM)irukandji Wrote: My issue is that it seems Juliette/Eve has been continually punished because she left Nick.I agree, but I think it was difficult for viewers to accept and go along G & K reinventing Juliette as a new character. Based on her reaction to Nick and their past, she might as well have arrived in Portland in S5. Viewers directed their anger & disappointment at Juliette instead of G & K. And according to G & K, Juliette didn’t exist in S5.
(05-21-2017, 07:00 PM)Tara Wrote: Yes, that true. And even through Adalind had her hand into almost everything what happened to Nick and Juliette. The only one who get the blame is Juliette - Adalind is the innocent woman.Whiffs of Adalind’s innocence and Juliette’s guilt could stem from how G & K chose to present the characters in S5. In what I can only assume was an effort to do something cool and unexpected, G & K transformed Juliette into a robotic fighting/killing machine alter ego who was completely dissociated from the events of S4 instead of allowing Nick and Juliette to work through the fallout individually and as a former couple. In the meantime, Adalind was presented as focusing on creating a safe and loving environment for her son, and finding her daughter. Adalind’s good intentions in S5 didn’t erase her past, and I don’t recall the show or forum posters insinuating that it did. But what would be the point of dwelling on Adalind’s past when she was obviously working toward a better future? The character Adalind is not to blame for the creative team’s decision to put off the characters Juliette and Nick confronting the fallout of S4 for an entire season.
"If my devils are to leave me, I am afraid my angels will take flight as well." Rainer Maria Rilke