(03-11-2016, 10:01 AM)Adriano Neres Rodrigues Wrote:(03-11-2016, 09:27 AM)irukandji Wrote: You know what I wish, Adriano? That instead of people accusing me of being arrogant, they just ask for clarification about something I typed.
I was not being arrogant, believe me. I was trying to explain something here and I didn't explain it very well. But I don't know that unless someone comes back and asks me.
You right.. I should have asked first... Would you forgive me?
I would like to know to read your thoughts you wish to explain it again....
Note: maybe the word has a more heavy meaning in English than in Portuguese... But certainly I was arrogant when I answered your post interpreting it in way with out asking about it first... I am really sorry...
There's nothing to forgive, Adriano. What I was trying to say really involved diplomatic immunity, and I got off talking about royalty and the like.
The way I understand diplomatic immunity, it is granted by the country the VIP (very important person) is traveling in. In Frederick's case that would be the US. I don't know a lot about it, but I am assuming that someone like Frederick would have to go through procedures here in the United States to be granted diplomatic status.
I am assuming he did so, because he's rented a mansion, cars, a helicopter. He's not in hidiing, but appearing in public. Again, I am assuming that if someone checked, he could show the proper paperwork to prove was in the US as a diplomat. The same would go for Kenneth.
From watching Grimm, it seems there are people who believe Frederick should be the king and would fight to see that happen. Likewise, there are people who prefer the democratic government and would fight to retain that.
Now, you're correct, Kenneth is not a king. But, he would need some proof that he should be considered a diplomat. Could he reasonably prove to the US government that he actually was trying to restore the monarchy and therefore should be considered a diplomat? If there was conflict going on to restore the monarchy, I think he could.
Let's say for the sake of argument that the US is 100% against Frederick's politics. But he's not coming to the US to promote his politics, he's coming over here to get his granddaughter. Let's also say the US granted him diplomat status. The US could not arrest him or Kenneth for their politics. Could they subsequently charge Kenneth with murder? I think it would get a little tricky there. And what about Juliette? Could she be considered an accomplice? I would have to say if Kenneth were charged, she probably could be charged too.
Conviction, on the other hand, might not ever occur. There are so many variables that took place that evening. For instance, something you brought up before. Did Kelly willingly walk into a trap, knowing she was going to die? That might change things for Juliette.
New Guy also brought up something I think is interesting. In the NBC recaps, Juliette is credited with telling Kelly the "house is safe". However, she did not tell Kelly that in her email. Did she tell her later? If so, was that a warning to Kelly?
Like I said, I think Kelly's plans included a lot more of her people on the premises that night and they didn't show up. So who really betrayed her? Juliette or someone else?
Does that make sense?
The best way to frustrate a cyberbully is to ignore him.