03-25-2017, 06:00 PM
(03-25-2017, 03:46 PM)irukandji Wrote:(03-25-2017, 03:42 PM)MarylikesGrimm Wrote:(03-25-2017, 03:28 PM)irukandji Wrote:(03-25-2017, 02:55 PM)MarylikesGrimm Wrote:(03-25-2017, 02:51 PM)irukandji Wrote: True, but here's the dilemma. If Adalind was really and truly comfortable with herself, sans hexenbiest, she wouldn't use it at all. Even at the request of someone else.
Would you risk someone's life rather than not do something you are uncomfortable with (ex CPR on a homeless stranger)?
Should Adalind compromise her principles simply because someone else is too lazy to look outside the box?
If you believe that letting someone died is ok then I see your view. I would never let someone die because I was not willing to think outside the box or be uncomfortable.
IMO no one is getting hurt when she uses her hexenbiest if she rarely does and is careful about when she does it.
What I'm saying is that Nick used Adalind for his own purposes rather than thinking of another way. *If* as you say, Adalind really and truly never wanted to access her hexenbiest again, then Nick is asking her to compromise her principles. There was no life at stake. Nick was just being lazy.
Now the other part to this question is Adalind herself. While she refrains from using her hexenbiest, I have to wonder at a person who doesn't do something to rid herself of it.
If she rids herself of the biest, there is no issue of whether or not to save a life. She would not be able to save a life because the force is no longer within her.
I felt all the scoobies lives were at risk both times this season Adalind used her hexenbiest.
I could not take CPR classes but why would that make me a better person?
Women characters do not have to be having sex with the lead to be important to the story.